Jonas, thank you for your response, please find my notes below
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> I don't think that we should follow what chrome is doing. Chrome and
> Android relies on that users make a lot of security decisions up front at
> installation time. This is bad
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 10:18:42 PM UTC+2, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> I don't think that we should follow what chrome is doing. Chrome and
>
> Android relies on that users make a lot of security decisions up front at
>
> installation time. This is bad for security as users have very little
>
> con
I don't think that we should follow what chrome is doing. Chrome and
Android relies on that users make a lot of security decisions up front at
installation time. This is bad for security as users have very little
context to make a decision on.
It also means that users have only one recourse if the
> >
>
> > Permissions - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=862377
>
> >
>
> > We're using our existing 'doorhanger' notifications to let users choose
> > whether they would like to share either their camera or mic (or both) with
> > a website that is requesting it, there is a mocku
Hi everyone, I'm the UX lead on Firefox for Android, so I can comment on what
we've done there with regard to WebRTC/gUM. I'll also look to FxOS UX people
for their thoughts here, although they may be fairly similar.
Permissions - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86237
On Saturday, June 15, 2013 6:08:28 AM UTC+10, iba...@mozilla.com wrote:
> Hi everyone, I'm the UX lead on Firefox for Android, so I can comment on what
> we've done there with regard to WebRTC/gUM. I'll also look to FxOS UX people
> for their thoughts here, although they may be fairly similar.
We are creating a cross-browser framework for packaged apps (
http://github.com/urbien/urbini ) and can provide info on how Chrome does it,
in my opinion much better, without any UX, matching from user's perspective how
native apps do it.
1. Packaged app in Chrome can request a videoCapture and
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Paul Theriault wrote:
> In bug 853356, there is some discussion around the permission granting
> mechanism to allow content to ask for microphone access via getUserMedia. The
> current plan is to use a prompt & permission combination similar to the way
> geoloca
On Saturday, April 27, 2013 11:56:34 AM UTC+8, Paul Theriault wrote:
> In bug 853356, there is some discussion around the permission granting
> mechanism to allow content to ask for microphone access via getUserMedia. The
> current plan is to use a prompt & permission combination similar to the w
In bug 853356, there is some discussion around the permission granting
mechanism to allow content to ask for microphone access via getUserMedia. The
current plan is to use a prompt & permission combination similar to the way
geolocation is handled. To me this API is much more sensitive than geol
10 matches
Mail list logo
