On 8/14/2014 9:58 AM, g...@novadsp.com wrote:
I am not sure if your problem is identical to one I recently had to solve.
XRE_InitEmbedding2Type on Windows uses ReadDependentCB() and TS_tfopen()
internally (implemented in nsXPCOMGlue.cpp. In the 2 helpers, which both
take char* parameters, the M
On 8/14/2014 9:08 AM, bhargava.animes...@gmail.com wrote:
In our code , we are having following snippet :
rv = NS_NewNativeLocalFile(nsEmbedCString((char *)filepath), PR_FALSE,
getter_AddRefs(libxul));
if (NS_FAILED(rv))
{
throw BALBrowserException();
}
On 8/14/2014 7:15 AM, bhargava.animes...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using gecko SDK 28.0 in my application. When my application is installed
in path having japanese/korean characters then in my embedded browser nothing
is shown.We found following error in logs
Could not read chrome manifest
'file:
On 4/15/2014 2:16 PM, Tom Hindle wrote:
This change means I can no longer use functions like
JS_ContextIterator from programs dlopenning or linking libxul.so.
On windows I can still use these symbols from xul.dll.
Have these symbols been intentionally hidden on Linux, by some
mechanism I'm
On 2/17/2014 11:07 AM, Christian Sell wrote:
3. steal a copy of the missing XPCOMUtils.jsm file and put it into the
xulrunner/modules directory
This should not be necessary. The correct location for this file is
within omni.ja, and it seems to be present in the XR27 release.
3. when building
On 2/13/2014 1:12 PM, Christian Sell wrote:
doesnt work. I am creating the file like this:
retval = directory->Get(NS_GRE_DIR, NS_GET_IID(nsILocalFile), (void **)&greDir);
file->InitWithFile(greDir);
file->AppendRelativePath(NS_LITERAL_STRING("components/components.manifest"));
the contents of
On 2/13/2014 12:17 PM, Christian Sell wrote:
Now I would like to rewrite this in C++, and am mighty stuck.
Why do you want this to be in C++? I strongly recommend writing as much
of this as you can in JS. It's going to be a more stable API surface,
especially if you're using DOM JS calls. I r
On 2/13/2014 12:31 PM, Christian Sell wrote:
Hello,
me again ;). We are embedding XULRunner in our Java application, using a thin
integration layer written in C++ that provides extended functionality. We also
have a XPCOM component written in Javascript, which we previously called though
Java
On 7/12/2012 12:11 PM, Blake Binkley wrote:
is there anyone who has XulRunner 10+ embedded in java?
I have been under the impression that javaXPCOM was no longer being worked on
and was a dead project, but in another thread here somone is talking about java
and having a new version of XulRunne
On 5/18/2012 4:20 AM, Babele Dunnit wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am updating our embedding app from Gecko7 to Gecko12. I get linking
errors:
In function `operator new(unsigned int)':
/dist/include/mozilla/mozalloc.h:229: undefined reference to
`moz_xmalloc'
In function `operator new[](unsigned int)'
On 3/13/2012 10:09 AM, Adam Dickmeiss wrote:
We have an application that has been working well since 1.9 through 9,
but in Xulrunner 10 we get a crash , on Linux, 64-bit.
#0 0x in ?? ()
#1 0x7310ca8b in mozilla::storage::(anonymous
namespace)::sqliteMemRoundup (n=)
On 3/5/2012 10:44 AM, Babele Dunnit wrote:
the subject says it all. I was expecting at least some activity on a
nsIWebProgressListener interface even if I do NOT implement any "new
tab/popup/new window" functionality (via nsIWindowCreator), but
nothing happens at all.
Is implementing nsIWindowCr
On 3/1/2012 9:32 AM, jameson.qu...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that Luke has ended up in Ben's explicit or implicit killfile.
This thread is now way off-topic. It was originally an announcement
about how we're removing *binary-stable* embedding APIs, and it has
morphed into a discussion about the
On 2/25/2012 7:05 AM, luke.leigh...@gmail.com wrote:
the first question is this: how the heck is it possible that i could create, in
under 3 weeks, an entire port of pyjamas-desktop to use the MSHTML IE engine,
*without* requiring access to the proprietary MSHTML Trident Engine?
The browser eng
On 2/25/2012 3:53 AM, luke.leigh...@gmail.com wrote:
We never solved it fully, and each embedder has had to
spend lots of time tweaking things.
perhaps it might be worthwhile for the mozilla foundation to find - and fund
- the people who _do_ understand these things, rather than tota
On 1/31/2012 12:44 AM, SHASHANKA DASARI wrote:
Dear all,
We have ported gecko in our application on an RTOS. It works fine. We
cannot end the application explicitly.
So we shutdown gecko using XRE_TermEmbedding().
To reinit we call XRE_InitEmbedding( ) again. This crashes.
Is there any other wa
On 1/9/2012 12:25 PM, Leander Bessa wrote:
Thanks for the reply, i stil have some questions though:
1) Are XPCOM componentes accessible through javascript?
Yes. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XPConnect for details.
2) Do any new JS modules or XPCOM components need to be integrated at bu
On 1/9/2012 6:34 AM, Leander Bessa wrote:
I'm trying to build an application which'll use html5 and css3 to
display its interface and a set of C++ apis to introduce features
beyond the scope of html.
It sounds like you really want XULRunner, not "embedding" in the
traditional sense. You can wri
On 12/22/2011 10:45 AM, lord_nemesis wrote:
Hello Benjamin (I am putting the name directly as I got help through
him and now having issue in that area),
This issue is putting us in most discomfort situation in business
line... Please take time and help us out from here
Problem:
We hav
On 11/28/2011 5:36 AM, philippe wrote:
Hello.
I built a browser with gecko 1.8 . It worked fine.
Now I try to use gecko 1.9.2.23. I get some conversions problems
For example:
__
nsString attributeName
char* attrName=ToNewCString(attributeName); causes an error : cannot
convert pa
On 11/4/2011 1:25 AM, Sunil Kumar wrote:
I dont want to use Any GUI windows( gtk_window/Window), so I wont have the
Handle/Pointer to a real window.
How can I call BaseWindow.initWindow without having a Handle or Pointer to
real window?
Currently you cannot, a window is required.
For a while Ch
On 11/3/2011 1:55 AM, Sunil Kumar wrote:
I am trying to build JavaXPCOM from XULRunner7.0.1-source.
JavaXPCOM has been removed from the main Mozilla tree because nobody was
maintaining the code. If somebody would like to take the code and make
it a standalone project, that is possible and I'd b
On 11/3/2011 9:12 AM, Sunil Kumar wrote:
I need to know what all I need to do and in Which order to load a URL in
nsWebBrowser instance.
It looks like you have not initialize the webbrowser. As far as I know,
you cannot use a webbrowser until you've set it up (using
nsIBaseWindow.initWindow and
On 9/6/2011 9:03 AM, Babele Dunnit wrote:
hi there,
is there any reason for which a line like
nsCOMPtr appInfo = do_GetService("@mozilla.org/xre/app-
info;1");
should fail giving back a null ptr? everything works, GRE is correctly
loaded etc.
BTW:
nsCOMPtr runtime(do_GetService("@mozilla
On 9/3/2011 11:07 AM, g...@novadsp.com wrote:
Apologies if this gets double-posted
Why is this defined only when XP_WIN is defined? A bug?
Because __fastcall is a Windows-specific annotation. GCC uses a
different syntax on x86-Linux. The problem here appears to be that you
aren't including xp
On 9/1/2011 8:24 AM, Glen Gray wrote:
Hey Guys,
Now that GtkMozEmbed etc. are gone, is there a documented and supported way to
build Gecko based browsers ? If so, what's the url for the docs.
Not "supported", no. But XRE_InitEmbedding still works and along with
nsWebBrowser can be used to load
On 9/1/2011 6:29 AM, g...@novadsp.com wrote:
Attempting to build WinEmbed from a VS2008 project and clearly missing
something.
Compiler #defines and settings are as make command line, which builds
correctly.
Does anyone recognize the following?
WebBrowserChrome.obj : "public: virtual unsigned i
On 7/1/2011 8:11 AM, arnuld wrote:
I was reading about DOM specification and came to know that Mozilla
supports DOM. I read MDN docs and see much of the documentation is
outdated If I want to use just only DOM to call some methods (e.g.
getElementsByTagName) through C++ interface (means XPCOM
On 5/25/2011 2:12 PM, Messica, Shay wrote:
A more problematic case, is when one browser invokes a Javascript
function that causes some RPC invoke on the second process. If the
native application process needs to open event loop or run some long
operation, we have to pump events while waiting for
On 5/25/2011 2:30 AM, Darth Coder wrote:
I understand that even in Firefox, the windows launched from the same
instance share the session data, but is there any way to get around
our issue? Basically we want the browser instance in child client
window to open the links in its own session without
On 5/16/2011 11:32 PM, Joffrey wrote:
Mozilla announced the end of Gecko embedding.
No I didn't. I announced that JavaXPCOM, gtkmozembed, and the ActiveX
control are not being maintained by the Mozilla project and would be
removed from the main tree.
Would this terminate embedding gecko in Win
On 4/20/2011 11:16 AM, Glen Gray wrote:
Hey guys,
So, further to the discussions about dropping the embedding technologies, I'm
interested in learning about what I can do to replace using GtkMozEmbed.
Somebody mentioned creating a xulrunner application. I don't really know
anything about that
On 4/7/11 3:42 PM, sdenning wrote:
4) Even if we do not use gtkmozembed directly, are there other components that
will be affected? Specifically, will there be an impact to programs like the
wxEmbed test driver: mozilla/embedding/tests/wxEmbed/
I don't think that code is built, and will like
On 4/7/11 9:29 AM, sdenn...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Benjamin,
1) I'm unclear of the impacts of removing gtkmozembed. Can you please clarify
which APIs and functionality will be impacted? For example, will
XRE_InitEmbedding go away with these near-term changes?
gtkmozembed is the code in embedd
On 4/7/11 9:41 AM, CMB wrote:
Would this terminate embedding gecko in IDE's (ex eclipse), TopStyle ecc.?
Eclipse uses javaxpcom to do embedding. If somebody wishes to maintain
that code, they may continue to do so, but it will not be built into
XULRunner or available in the main mozilla codebas
On 3/30/2011 8:52 AM, Martin Lutken wrote:
Simple question.
If I follow build instructions found here
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Configuring_Build_Options
enabling "xulrunner" as application. (Building on Ubuntu 10.10 )
I use a MOZ_OBJDIR and everything compiles fine.
My problem is how
Last summer, I led a session at the Mozilla summit to discuss whether
and how we ought to continue supporting our various embedding efforts
(gtkmozembed, javaxpcom, the ActiveX control, the NSView embedding
widget, etc) given the effort involved in preserving their various
degrees of code and b
On 3/8/2011 7:57 AM, Darth Coder wrote:
I am trying to embed Mozilla 1.9.2.12 into an MFC application. With
the release target everything is working fine, but the thing is that I
want to use the release binaries (with debugging info) for the both
the debug as well. For debug I am building the rel
On 2/16/2011 11:28 PM, Peter Tsonev wrote:
My understanding of the embedding process (one of the possible ways)
is that 1) GRE is found,
2) XPCOMGlue is started up, 3) XUL functions are initialized, 4)
XRE_InitEmbedding is called.
Yes. Note that I strongly recommend that you never try to use a "
On 2/14/2011 3:05 PM, Peter wrote:
However, the documentation on embedding is a bit fuzzy and all over
the place. I am not even completely sure with the terminology as it
keeps changing and is mixed up in the docs.
This is because there is little or no embedding community. The Mozilla
community
On 11/8/10 1:04 PM, g...@novadsp.com wrote:
Compiler command line:
cl /Od /I "U:\mozilla\mozilla-1.9.2\_VS2008\xul-debug\dist\include"
/D "WIN32" /D "_WINDOWS" /D "_DEBUG" /D "XP_WIN" /D "XPCOM_GLUE"
/D "_AFXDLL" /D "_MBCS" /FD /EHsc /MDd /Zc:wchar_t- /Yu"stdafx.h"
/Fp"Debug\MozMFC.pch" /Fo"Deb
On 11/8/10 12:10 PM, g...@novadsp.com wrote:
Is there some mozconfig option which stops these classes being included in
libraries? The .obj files are definitely in ..\build\gfx\thebes\src but I'm
getting linker errors (edited example below)
: error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "__declspec
On 11/6/10 8:52 AM, Xijing Dai wrote:
I have a questions about javascript extension after you embeding the
xulrunner.
so far, i found that if you want to write a extension to the
javascript, u have to create a component, isn't it?
Could you perhaps be more specific? By "extension to the javas
On 11/8/10 8:40 AM, g...@novadsp.com wrote:
I'm extending my MozMFC example to handle rendering into a Win32 bitmap. I
start with the following ...
nsCOMPtr context;
context =
do_CreateInstance("@mozilla.org/content/canvas-rendering-context;1?id=2d",
&rv);
This really doesn't make any sense. T
This is a followup to presentations which occurred in the development
meeting in June, as well as presentations at the Mozilla summit. Please
direct questions and followup to the mozilla.dev.platform group.
In order to improve performance and maintain the Mozilla codebase, we have
decided that
On 8/9/10 12:00 PM, g...@novadsp.com wrote:
On 09/08/2010 16:31, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
In any case, you'd be signing yourself/your company up for lots of
additional testing work for a goal which isn't shared by the Mozilla
community. That makes little sense from an economic p
On 8/9/10 12:00 PM, g...@novadsp.com wrote:
My notion is that the standard make-driven build process generates a VS
project file. Thus no additional dependencies or maintenance required. In a
corporate context I'd expect one dev/make monkey to generate said VSP for
use by relevant team members.
On 8/9/10 11:12 AM, g...@novadsp.com wrote:
Whilst the default build settings for Firefox may perfectly suit the needs
of the Firefox team, they do not neccessarily fit well with embedding hosts.
Shared runtime libraries being a case in point. Surely non-standard builds
can be tested in exactly
On 8/8/10 1:48 PM, Jani Mäkinen wrote:
I'm curious, what is the smallest size you guys have gotten the gecko
browser fitted into?
Why does this matter to you?
I'm working on a project right now where I need(and I believe many
others will need aswell) a programmatically controlled browser DLL
On 8/4/10 1:26 AM, Sarah Weinberger wrote:
I searched the Mozilla developer website and I see a lot of mention of
the Gecko ActiveX (COM) engine and how easy it is to use, but what I
cannot find is how to get it. Is the ActiveX control posted
somewhere?
I don't think so, I think you have to b
On 7/20/10 11:13 AM, sultan wrote:
Hello,
Is there anyway to use Firefox or Gecko core from within python e.g.
import Firefox or import Gecko?
So far for now I am using QtWebKit.
There is a project called PyXPCOM, but it is primarily focused on using
python within XULRunner applications, rathe
On 7/13/10 9:29 AM, g...@novadsp.com wrote:
Is there a mechanism to allow the file resources in /dist/chrome and
/dist/components etc to be packed into a shared library (DLL on Windows?)
Not currently. With the new 'omnijar' work it may become easier, because you
can embed all the mozilla reso
On 7/9/10 6:28 AM, Cyril wrote:
Please help me to find a solution of the following problem: there is
some zip-archive which contains html, css, js etc. I need a browser
calls to my code and then the code takes the data from zip-archive. Is
it possible to realize it without the new protocol of OS
On 6/28/10 10:04 AM, Glen Gray wrote:
So to be clear, I can enable this for all plugins via
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled. true
OR, I can enable it for all plugins via
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled true
Is that correct ?
Yes.
--BDS
___
dev-embedding mailing
On 6/28/10 8:23 AM, Glen Gray wrote:
Hey Guys,
I'm wondering if GtkMozEmbed based applications will take advantage of
the plugin crash protection offered under the release of FireFox 3.6.4/
xulrunner 1.9.2.4 ?
Are there are recommended ways of testing this crash protection ? -- Glen
Gray
The
On 6/16/10 11:29 AM, Babele Dunnit wrote:
But, when I link "xul" (and I need that for our REAL app), "dl" seems
no loger needed, "mozjs" is needed to resolve stuff like (...)/
You cannot link "xul" and use standalone linkage. What symbols do you need
from xul?
The point of standalone linkag
On 6/11/10 4:51 AM, Ami Ganguli wrote:
Now I've run into "ToNewUnicode", which seems to be defined in-ine in
one of the headers. I'm not sure why the linker is looking for it if
it's in-line, but obviously it doesn't end up being in any of the
libraries.
You haven't got a lot of details what
I have disabled building the Mozilla ActiveX control in every configuration
(it was being built only in XULRunner builds), because there is no active
maintainer. I intend to remove the code from the tree fairly soon.
If you would like to volunteer to resurrect and maintain the ActiveX
control,
The NS_InitEmbedding API, which was replaced by XRE_InitEmbedding several
years ago, has finally been removed from the tree and will not be available
in the next release. If you are still using this API, please switch to
XRE_InitEmbedding (or use NS_InitXPCOM2 directly).
This happened in bug 5
On 4/19/10 5:24 PM, n179911 wrote:
If browser/gtk/tests uses browser/gtk/src by linking to libxul.so
(since you mentioned it is built to a static library as a part of
libxul.so), I don't understand why this does not link:
The tests use standalone linkage. They do not link directly to libxul.so
On 4/19/10 4:20 PM, n179911 wrote:
Thanks. I think I have questions about the embedding browser build
system.
Are these 2 directories compiled in 1 static library? or 2? From the
Makefile.in, it looks like they are the same 'module'.
embedding/browser/gtk/tests/
embedding/browser/gtk/src/
No.
On 4/18/10 4:25 PM, n179911 wrote:
In 'gtkmozembed_glue.cpp', it has this comment '// This file is an
implementation file, meant to be #included in a
// single C++ file of an embedding application. It is called after
// XPCOMGlueStartup to glue the gtkmozembed functions.'
My question is why it
On 4/17/10 1:33 PM, Michael I wrote:
You're in luck. ctypes was just recently moved into Spidermonkey (js/src),
in bug 538324. There is now a function JS_InitCTypesClass which is available
if you configure spidermonkey --enable-ctypes.
Of course this is only available on bleeding-edge spidermon
On 4/17/10 9:41 AM, Michael I wrote:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/JSctypes
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript_code_modules/ctypes.jsm
is it possible to use this functionallity without component jsm,
directlly only with spidermonkey ?
How to include this and compile ?
You're in luck. ctyp
On 4/14/10 10:04 AM, Georgios Petasis wrote:
I have written some C++ code, which interfaces Mozilla with Tcl/Tk.
Tcl/Tk is the owner of the "main" thread, and runs a message loop on it.
My code somewhat works: I can start Mozilla, load a few pages (~10), and
then everything locks. :-)
I still h
On 4/14/10 9:31 AM, Georgios Petasis wrote:
Does Mozilla assumes that has the control of the main thread?
(And wants to run a message loop on it?)
Mozilla assumes that there is a message loop on the main thread, yes. There
are slight differences between whether we spin our own event loop (usi
On 4/14/10 4:01 AM, flt...@yahoo.com wrote:
For example (again, this is not what I am trying to
do, but just an example to illustrate) if I want to
periodically clean all the cache in the background, withou
user interaction, I would say create a thread that calls
nsICacheService's method to do
On 4/13/10 1:44 PM, hap497 wrote:
Is main thread same as 'UI' thread?
Yes.
For example, if I click a button to submit a form. These will happen:
1. build a query string
2. send the HTTP Post/Get
This step may occur on multiple threads. Our network engine internally uses
threading so that
On 4/12/10 3:49 AM, flt...@yahoo.com wrote:
My question is, how would I ensure my calls are
thread safe? Does XPCOM guarantee that I can
call the XPCOM interface functions from any thread
and internally Firefox will ensure the
thread safety?
No. Most Mozilla interfaces are *not* thread safe, a
On 2/15/10 9:54 AM, testols ols wrote:
The code compiles successfully but gives following errors during
linking.
Undefined symbols:
"vtable for nsSupportsWeakReference", referenced from:
__d...@0 in WebBrowserChrome.o
"_N
On 2/3/10 4:04 PM, Timothy Madden wrote:
Follow up to mozilla.dev.embedding please.
On this mozilla.org page
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/embedding/embedapiref/embedapi2.html#1099700
about Embedding Initialization I think the documentation for
NS_InitEmbedding should say the first paramet
On 12/2/09 7:01 AM, Blaine Monkey wrote:
I defined the NS_STATIC_CAST in main.cpp code because isn't defined in
nscore.h. [#define NS_STATIC_CAST(__type, __ptr) static_cast< __type
(__ptr)]
Indeed, we removed NS_STATIC_CAST and recommend that people just use
static_cast() directly.
On 11/25/09 4:32 AM, Blaine Monkey wrote:
> executables, I think this is the correct way, in't it? I saw the code
> of other examples and is the same. I don't know what can be the
> problem. Any idea?
No, you'll need to actually debug the problem.
--BDS
__
On 11/24/09 9:41 AM, Blaine Monkey wrote:
> I've a xulrunner C++ embedding example, it compiles and generates the
> executable, but when I run it, the XRE_InitEmbedding fails. I've xulrunner
> installed in /opt/xulrunner-1.9.1.4
>
> What am I doing wrong?
The code doesn't look bad offhand. I was
On 11/10/09 8:36 AM, Viktor Tymoshenko wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it seems that embedding does not work anymore just after the use of
> TLS(thread local STORAGE) variables was introduced
> in order to make NS_IsMainThread faster.
> (see
> http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.1/log/27d9d4107522/xp
On 10/26/09 4:49 AM, graniteglory wrote:
> 3. I can not find MFCEmbed anywhere including "mozilla-1.9.1/embedding/
> tests"
MFCEmbed was very old, unmaintained and broken code and has been removed.
> 4. Other tests (winEmbed, wxEmbed) do not compile correctly or VC++
> project does not convert o
On 8/25/09 7:45 AM, SimOut wrote:
> Maybe I have specified the incorrect GREVersionRange? Does my current
> range include 1.9.0.12:
> {"1.9a", PR_TRUE, "2", PR_TRUE } ?
That looks ok, although I would probably do {"1.9", PR_TRUE, "1.9.0.*", PR_TRUE.
What XULRunner is it actually finding? You can
On 8/25/09 6:28 AM, SimOut wrote:
> When trying to start the application, I get this error:
> --
> error while loading shared libraries: libgtkembedmoz.so: cannot open
> shared
> object file: No such file or directory
> --
>
> The source code worked in previous rel
On 8/25/09 4:53 AM, tonikitoo (Antonio Gomes) wrote:
> I believe you should link against libxul (?)
If you are using the standalone glue (which it appears SimOut is using
correctly), you should not link against libxul.
--BDS
___
dev-embedding mailing
On 8/25/09 1:47 AM, SimOut wrote:
> --
> static const GREVersionRange greVersion = {"1.9a", PR_TRUE, "2",
> PR_TRUE };
> GRE_GetGREPathWithProperties(&greVersion, 1, nsnull, 0, xpcomPath,
> sizeof(xpcomPath));
> XPCOMGlueStartup(xpcomPath);
> GTKEm
On 8/24/09 7:16 AM, Mayank wrote:
> Is it possible to use firefox as XULRUNNER, where I can write a XUL
> file to make a browser and run it on the existing firefox (using it as
> gecko and javascript engine), then I can run my application in the new
> xul browser.
Yes, you can use firefox -app to
On 7/1/09 5:47 AM, David Pérez wrote:
> We’ve made a simple XULRunner app, coded in Java.
> We’ve observed that it has huge memory leaks.
> Rewriting the same app in Javascript, we observe no leaks.
That's certainly possible. JavaXPCOM doesn't have an owner and I may
consider removing it in the n
On 3/3/09 5:18 PM, Igor Ulyanov wrote:
> The problem is in LoadLibraryEx with xul.dll and later xpcom.dll
> FormatMessage in cpp file nsgluelinkinwin.cpp wprintf with GetLastError
> prints garbage in console (something like ). If i add any code
This is probably a problem with DLL dependen
On 3/2/09 3:09 PM, Igor Ulyanov wrote:
> В Пнд, 02/03/2009 в 15:00 -0500, Benjamin Smedberg пишет:
>> On 3/2/09 2:44 PM, Igor Ulyanov wrote:
>>>> On 3/2/09 12:37 PM, Igor Ulyanov wrote:
>>>>> Who can help with such problem? Debug version of my embedded program
&
On 3/2/09 2:44 PM, Igor Ulyanov wrote:
>> On 3/2/09 12:37 PM, Igor Ulyanov wrote:
>>> Who can help with such problem? Debug version of my embedded program
>>> works fine, but release version failes at XPCOMGlueStartup. I have
>>> changed some mozilla interfaces but not sure it is the reason.
>> Hav
On 3/2/09 12:37 PM, Igor Ulyanov wrote:
> Who can help with such problem? Debug version of my embedded program
> works fine, but release version failes at XPCOMGlueStartup. I have
> changed some mozilla interfaces but not sure it is the reason.
Have you stepped through to figure out what exactly i
On 2/5/09 7:17 AM, Anna Nachesa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to create the "embedding build": i.e. after a successful build,
> I do the following:
> cd /embedding
> make
> cd /embedding/config
> make
Don't do this. It may have been the right thing to do some time long ago in
the past. Now XULRun
On 1/28/09 7:27 AM, Walter Fettich wrote:
> I'd like to draw attention on a bug I found when using the source server.
>
> When trying to debug the function nsIWebBrowser::GetContentDOMWindow () the
> source server tries to execute the following command:
>
> cvs.exe -d :pserver:anonym...@cvs-mirr
On 1/15/09 7:10 AM, Dmitry V. Zhulanov wrote:
> Hello, Developers!
>
> I try to implement custom protocol handler. I follow [1] to create VC
> project, and use chrome protocol handler as base.
>
> If I install my handler to firefox its all ok. But If I install it to GRE
> nothing happened. I try
Dmitry V. Zhulanov wrote:
> I'd like to reduce download size. And I don't need XUL. I want
> to get html only render, without extensions like address bar or
> any other XUL widgets. So I want to remove as many as possible.
I don't think you will achieve much smaller download size and your embeddin
Dmitry Zhulanov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I interesting in embedding gecko htrml rendering to my own application
> (which is derived from winEmbed). Gecko may be best renderer, but the
> size of it too big.
>
> xul.dll about 10Mb. It is exist any group which is amed to reduce GRE
> size?
Can you be speci
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I use embedding glue, a small local html file comes up in 22s, 7
> seconds is spent in XPCOMGlueStartup.
> When I use Dependent glue, the same local html file comes up in 15s
> seconds. I do not call XPCOMGlueStartup.
Now you need to profile the 7 seconds in XPCOMG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Can you be specific about where the time is being spent? Loading libraries
>> can be expensive no matter what. Is it possible that the delay is just more
>> noticable to you because rather than taking the hit at startup (the dynamic
>> loader links the libraries before c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a written a small web browser based on gtkembedmoz that was
> working fine with firefox-2. Then I have switched to firefox-3 and I
> have noticed that i have to use GRE_GetGREPathWithProperties,
> XPCOMGlueStartup and GTKEmbedGlueStartup to make it usab
John Cebasek wrote:
> We have a plugin and associated dylibs on Mac OS X that works with
> Firefox 2, which now must be brought up Firefox 3. I've got the code
> compiling, but I'm having a weird link error. Well, it's not that weird,
> it's not finding a bunch of symbols. But where did they go
steve lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am linking my embedding app against the FIREFOX_3_0_1_RELEASE and
> MOZ_CO_PROJECT=xulrunner code base
> and following libs.
>
> nspr4.lib
> plc4.lib
> plds4.lib
> xul.lib
> xpcomglue.lib
> profdirserviceprovidersa_s.lib
> jpeg3250.lib
>
> And with XPCOM_GLUE=1 defin
Alexey 'Spry' Pelykh wrote:
> 2a) savePrefFile(nsIFile aFile); to save, needs to be called manually?
> 2b) readUserPrefs(nsIFile aFile); to load, also needs to be called
No, you should not need to do anything with the pref files. When the
prefservice is created it will do all the correct things.
Alexey 'Spry' Pelykh wrote:
> 1) So, now the load of my cookies cache, preferences etc. is made
> somewhere inside
> nsr = nsProfileDirProvider->SetProfileDir(nsLocalAppDataDir);
> ?
Not exactly. SetProfileDir just sets up a "directory service provider". Then
other code can at any time ask "what
Alexey 'Spry' Pelykh wrote:
> The subject is that I want to use some kind of dynamic profile
> switching, and as far as I understand nsIProfile was used to do that.
> But the posts I've read are dated back to 2006, and now it seems to be
> or deprecated or completely out of date. 'Creation' of nsIP
pedro wrote:
> Also, very little extensions are available for FF3 at the moment.
Most of the major extensions on addons.mozilla.org have been updated to work
with FF3 beta 5, which is roughly the same as FF3.
--BDS
___
dev-embedding mailing list
dev-e
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
