Yes people it's really sourceforge.net/projects/phpbind
IT looks like I was on crack when I wrote that. Geez.
Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> BTW: Since everyone is playing with Bind, I write a php bind class which
> works pretty well. Easy to tie into opensrs.
>
> sourceforce.net/proj
Argh, you're right. Too many distractions while writing that email.
Alex
David S. Smiley writes:
> Alex - I believe you meant
> "sourceforge.net/projects/phpbind", not sourceforce.
>
> Doc Smiley
>
Alexey Zilber
DAYAK
Need to register or transfer a domain?
www.dayak.com charges only $15/y
Alex - I believe you meant
"sourceforge.net/projects/phpbind", not sourceforce.
Doc Smiley
BTW: Since everyone is playing with Bind, I write a php bind class which
works pretty well. Easy to tie into opensrs.
sourceforce.net/projects/phpbind
Alex
Tom Savino writes:
> Here's how to do it in a nut shell it works because that is how I run my
> nameservers but I do have backup namese
Here's how to do it in a nut shell it works because that is how I run my
nameservers but I do have backup nameservers:
named.conf file:
zone "0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA" {
type master;
file "localhost.rev";
};
localhost
Why does the secondary have to be yours?
Surely, someone else needs a secondary name server -- and is willing to
trade?
-Original Message-
From: Sergei Kolodka
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 10:44 AM
To: Joe
Cc: dev-list
Subject:RE: Playing with bind...
Oh, sorry
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Scott Fraser wrote:
>
> hallo joe, sergei, etc.
>
> i find it fascinating how few of the responses to this thread actually
> address the question .. instead they all seem to be trying to impress each
> other by how much they know about "the right way to do it"(tm)
>
> i ag
t;
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, 27. October 2000 09:58
> > To: Sergei Kolodka
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Playing with bind...
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Sergei
> Sorry Colin, I always take issue with scare tactics, so don't take this
> personally...
No problem. Anything to educate the masses is good by me. :)
> Please don't attempt to worry potential customers into choosing you simply
> because their ISP has all their name servers in the same physica
s
servers for that domain
-s.
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 27. October 2000 09:58
> To: Sergei Kolodka
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Playing with bind...
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Sergei Kolodka wrote:
>
> &g
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Colin Viebrock wrote:
> > OK: Install a second machine and run named.
> > Good : Visit one of the public DNS providers and utilize their services
> > (like easyDNS.com)
> > Better: Ask your ISP to do secondary DNS for you.
> > Best : Do all of the above.
>
> Si
> OK: Install a second machine and run named.
> Good : Visit one of the public DNS providers and utilize their services
> (like easyDNS.com)
> Better: Ask your ISP to do secondary DNS for you.
> Best : Do all of the above.
Since you mentioned us, I thought I'd just add a word or two
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Sergei Kolodka wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> Need smart advice. I'm trying to set two binds
> at one host with ip aliasing. Just to register
> both in Registry database.
Smart advice: Don't do this. The whole reason for having more than one DNS
server is to prevent outages if one of
#x27;s the difference between "host unreachable" which can be a temporary
outage, and "host unknown" which sounds permanent.
-- Lynn
-Original Message-
From: Paul Khavkine
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 9:11 AM
To: Sergei Kolodka
Cc: dev-list
Subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
What's the point of having 2 nameds vs 1 named. I dont see why running
1 named is not enough.
Cheers
Paul
**
PGP Key:
Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID
pub 2048/D467B527 19
By default, I believe BIND listens on all IP addresses, so you could
probably run one copy and simply omit the listen-on option.
HOWEVER, note that this completely defeats the purpose of requiring two DNS
servers! Ideally, you should have two they should be on separate subnets.
At the very least
16 matches
Mail list logo
