Yue Wang wrote:
Hi:
WOW! This is very impressive! Thanks for your work.
So I think we can add vertical CJK typesetting feature to LuaTeX/MKIV
next year?
it all depends a bit on integration in the output routine/pagebody
builder, but it should be doable (more a topic for the context list the
Jonathan Fine wrote:
As subject. xdv is the eXtended DVi format used by XeTeX.
No, it cannot. Perhaps it should, but that needs a volunteer.
Best wishes,
Taco
___
dev-luatex mailing list
dev-luatex@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-lua
As subject. xdv is the eXtended DVi format used by XeTeX.
I did a search on the mailing list archive and nothing came up.
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dev-luatex%40ntg.nl&q=xdv
Jonathan
___
dev-luatex mailing list
dev-luatex@ntg.nl
http:/
Hi:
WOW! This is very impressive! Thanks for your work.
So I think we can add vertical CJK typesetting feature to LuaTeX/MKIV
next year?
[Wolfgang is busy writing the wishlist for cjk typesetting, so i think
he will be very interested in experimenting your results]
Yue Wang
On Tue, Dec 30, 20
>>Furthermore you all talk about LTR and RTL, but what about vertical
>>typesetting, in the Chinese or in >the Mongolian way? Obviously TeX-e-Parsi
>>doesn't care about that.
>
> It's true. and I think Omega did not handle that well either.
Actually, Omega did a reasonable job, the bottleneck
> What? I'm confident that all of us have a great respect and admiration for
> Donald Knuth and his work, and that none of us worship him.
Just out of interest, how do you know this? I, myself, indulge in daily
practice of libations and creed in honor of His achievements. I consider using
Te
Jonathan Fine wrote:
actually i've heard Don say (at an ntg QA session long ago) that he
was surprised that there were no more fundamental extensions like
pdftex (at that time upcoming); also, there is a difference between
(say) 2^4 fundamental different tex variants and 2^32 confusingly
slig
Zhichu Chen wrote:
Hi Taco,
I downloaded the code and compiled it on my Leopard 10.5.5 with gcc
4.0.1 from Xcode, and I got a lot of, almost every one of,
Not even close to all of them, don't worry :)
It is a small error on my side (every object file should define at
least one symbol accordi
