Re: [Dev-luatex] os.spawn and argv[1] with sapces

2009-11-27 Thread T T
2009/11/27 Taco Hoekwater : > > > T T wrote: >> 2009/11/27 Taco Hoekwater : >>> T T wrote: The above changes do not change the behaviour of currently working cases, only the failing ones and those resulting in wrongly parsed arguments being passed to the child process are affected. >

Re: [Dev-luatex] os.spawn and argv[1] with sapces

2009-11-27 Thread Paweł Jackowski
T T wrote: 2009/11/27 Taco Hoekwater : T T wrote: The above changes do not change the behaviour of currently working cases, only the failing ones and those resulting in wrongly parsed arguments being passed to the child process are affected. If that proposal sounds OK to you, I will write a pa

Re: [Dev-luatex] os.spawn and argv[1] with sapces

2009-11-27 Thread Taco Hoekwater
T T wrote: > 2009/11/27 Taco Hoekwater : >> T T wrote: >>> The above changes do not change the behaviour of currently working >>> cases, only the failing ones and those resulting in wrongly parsed >>> arguments being passed to the child process are affected. >>> >>> If that proposal sounds OK to

Re: [Dev-luatex] os.spawn and argv[1] with sapces

2009-11-27 Thread T T
2009/11/27 Taco Hoekwater : > T T wrote: >> >> The above changes do not change the behaviour of currently working >> cases, only the failing ones and those resulting in wrongly parsed >> arguments being passed to the child process are affected. >> >> If that proposal sounds OK to you, I will write