On 1 mrt. 2011, at 17:59, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 05:52:23PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>> Yes, but what puzzles me is the 'random runtime failures' so what
>> font is the one that triggers it?
>
> Looks like automated QA tool, so just a preemptive warning.
>
There was
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 05:52:23PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1-3-2011 12:52, Toralf Förster wrote:
> >
> >Hans Hagen wrote at 11:05:40
> >>On 28-2-2011 9:26, Toralf Förster wrote:
> >>> usr/bin/luatex
> >>>
> >>> * QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
> >>>
On 1-3-2011 12:52, Toralf Förster wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote at 11:05:40
On 28-2-2011 9:26, Toralf Förster wrote:
usr/bin/luatex
* QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
*fine but exhibit random runtime failures.
* luatexdir/luafontloader/fo
On 28-2-2011 9:26, Toralf Förster wrote:
usr/bin/luatex
* QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
*fine but exhibit random runtime failures.
* luatexdir/luafontloader/fontforge/fontforge/nouiutil.c:49: warning: attempt
to free a non-heap object '
