Hans Hagen writes:
> in cases where you use tex as processsing engine one can avoid most
> tex and especially nasty parsing by just keeping the tricky stuff at
> the lua end or in the case of lilypond at the lisp end: just avoid
> parsing at the tex end and spit out predictable tex code ... no us
On 5/7/2013 7:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
The pipelining (rather than lexer switching) approach used by LuaTeX
also means that error messages related to Lua/TeX interoperation are
useless: they can't refer to the original source location since that has
been lost during tokenizing and detokenizin
Hans Hagen writes:
> in cases where you use tex as processsing engine one can avoid most
> tex and especially nasty parsing by just keeping the tricky stuff at
> the lua end or in the case of lilypond at the lisp end: just avoid
> parsing at the tex end and spit out predictable tex code ... no us
On 5/7/2013 5:57 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Actually, one of such people is a major financial backer of my ongoing
work on LilyPond since working on beating consistency into a programming
model that was a loose connection of independent hacks at one point of
time was what empowered increasingly ef
On 5/7/2013 1:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Hi,
at the recent BachoTeX conference, I held a talk comparing LuaTeX and
LilyPond integration of their respective extension languages. Now the
talk slot was just 30 minutes, so the talk was quite more condensed than
the proceedings, and I probably wou
Taco Hoekwater writes:
> Hi David,
>
> On May 7, 2013, at 1:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> I've added some rough sketches at the end of the article that should
>> make clear why this can't be done in formats alone but will require
>> primitive support as well if things are supposed to turn out
Hi David,
On May 7, 2013, at 1:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> I've added some rough sketches at the end of the article that should
> make clear why this can't be done in formats alone but will require
> primitive support as well if things are supposed to turn out nicely.
My brain is wired such t
Bruno Le Floch writes:
> Hello David,
>
>> comparing LuaTeX and LilyPond integration of their respective
>> extension languages.
>> [...]
>> I've added some rough sketches at the end of the article that should
>> make clear why this can't be done in formats alone but will require
>> primitive sup
Hello David,
> comparing LuaTeX and LilyPond integration of their respective extension
> languages.
> [...]
> I've added some rough sketches at the end of the article that should
> make clear why this can't be done in formats alone but will require
> primitive support as well if things are suppos
