On 11/30/2010 09:01 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Do you propose to drop \Omegaversion because you changed the Omega
code and forgot to increase the version number? :)
The Omega code is not so much 'changed', but lots of bits of it have
been removed by now, and especially there are no translation proc
On 30-11-2010 1:30, Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
On 30 November 2010 Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 30-11-2010 12:09, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:49:32 -0700, Khaled Hosny
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I was wondering, since luatex is not a dir
On 30 November 2010 Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 30-11-2010 12:09, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:49:32 -0700, Khaled Hosny
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I was wondering, since luatex is not a direct replacement of pdftex,
> >> omega or aleph, what is the p
On 30-11-2010 12:09, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:49:32 -0700, Khaled Hosny
wrote:
I was wondering, since luatex is not a direct replacement of pdftex,
omega or aleph, what is the point of having such primitives? Wouldn't it
be more cleaner of they are r
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:49:32 -0700, Khaled Hosny
wrote:
I was wondering, since luatex is not a direct replacement of pdftex,
omega or aleph, what is the point of having such primitives? Wouldn't it
be more cleaner of they are removed or is there any use for them?
It may be that Yannis an
On 29-11-2010 4:57, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
On 11/29/2010 04:49 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
I was wondering, since luatex is not a direct replacement of pdftex,
omega or aleph, what is the point of having such primitives? Wouldn't it
be more cleaner of they are removed or is there any use for them?
On 11/29/2010 05:43 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Yes, but is that safe, i.e. is it safe to blindly treat luatex as pdftex
vXX or etex vXX?
etex yes,
pdftex maybe,
aleph|omega most probably not.
Best wishes,
Taco
___
dev-luatex mailing list
dev-luatex@ntg
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 05:16:22PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2010/11/29 Khaled Hosny :
> > I was wondering, since luatex is not a direct replacement of pdftex,
> > omega or aleph, what is the point of having such primitives? Wouldn't it
> > be more cleaner of they are removed or is there any
2010/11/29 Khaled Hosny :
> I was wondering, since luatex is not a direct replacement of pdftex,
> omega or aleph, what is the point of having such primitives? Wouldn't it
> be more cleaner of they are removed or is there any use for them?
>
> pdftexversion
> pdftexrevision
>
> OmegaVersion
>
> Ale
On 11/29/2010 04:49 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
I was wondering, since luatex is not a direct replacement of pdftex,
omega or aleph, what is the point of having such primitives? Wouldn't it
be more cleaner of they are removed or is there any use for them?
I have no opinion on these (I certainly do
I was wondering, since luatex is not a direct replacement of pdftex,
omega or aleph, what is the point of having such primitives? Wouldn't it
be more cleaner of they are removed or is there any use for them?
pdftexversion
pdftexrevision
OmegaVersion
AlephVersion
Alephminorversion
Alephrevision
A
11 matches
Mail list logo
