Re: HTML5 video contrast issues

2014-03-20 Thread Chris Pearce
On 3/20/2014 11:02 AM, Aaron F. Ross wrote: Hi Chris Thanks for the tip about the NVIDIA driver. I had experienced that issue previously with VLC itself, but with current versions of VLC I was not seeing the issue, so I changed the NVIDIA driver back to the default of 16-235. Interesting. Th

Re: HTML5 video contrast issues

2014-03-20 Thread Aaron F. Ross
It should also be noted that this issue does not exist in Internet Explorer nor in Google Chrome. It's definitely a Firefox bug/feature. ___ dev-media mailing list dev-media@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media

Re: HTML5 video contrast issues

2014-03-20 Thread Aaron F. Ross
Here is a screen capture demonstrating the issue. It's quite dramatic. On the left is the file open in Photoshop, on the right is the dimmed out poster image in Firefox 27.0.1. http://dr-yo.com/temp/firefox_html5_poster_image_issue.png The cursor isn't visible in the screen capture, but it is n

Re: No USE-CANDIDATE in stun request for WebRTC

2014-03-20 Thread Randell Jesup
On 3/20/2014 2:18 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:40 AM, wrote: Calling from FF 32 (nightly) to Chrome works fine, however calling from Chrome to FF fails. What I can see is FF sending a couple of STUN bind requests to the server, but it never puts the USE-CANDIDATE into a

Re: No USE-CANDIDATE in stun request for WebRTC

2014-03-20 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:40 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > Calling from FF 32 (nightly) to Chrome works fine, however calling from > Chrome to FF fails. > > What I can see is FF sending a couple of STUN bind requests to the server, > but it never puts the USE-CANDIDATE into any of them. Any idea why this

No USE-CANDIDATE in stun request for WebRTC

2014-03-20 Thread agranig
Hi, Calling from FF 32 (nightly) to Chrome works fine, however calling from Chrome to FF fails. What I can see is FF sending a couple of STUN bind requests to the server, but it never puts the USE-CANDIDATE into any of them. Any idea why this could be the case? Andreas ___

Re: Implement WebP image support

2014-03-20 Thread pascal . massimino
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 10:26:31 PM UTC+1, Rowan Lewis wrote: > This is in follow up to the following bug: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=856375 > [...] > > > (In reply to Zach Lym from comment #192) > > > Facebook trialed WebP but their users rejected it because they >