Re: DTLS-SRTP roles

2013-05-01 Thread lminiero
Thanks for the clarification. The latest posts were, respectively, "Firefox currently treats the caller as the server and the callee as the client" (which is what you just confirmed again, IIUC), and "I should mention that we reversed this order about a month ago, which may have been confusing t

Re: DTLS-SRTP roles

2013-04-30 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:40 AM, wrote: > Hi Eric, > > apologies for this very late reply to a post you sent a couple of months > ago, but I only recently started trying to get DTLS working in Asterisk as > well. I'm still stuck with a few other issues, but I'd like to focus on > this one at firs

Re: DTLS-SRTP roles

2013-04-30 Thread lminiero
Hi Eric, apologies for this very late reply to a post you sent a couple of months ago, but I only recently started trying to get DTLS working in Asterisk as well. I'm still stuck with a few other issues, but I'd like to focus on this one at first and then try and address the other ones in other

Re: DTLS-SRTP roles

2013-02-22 Thread Eric Rescorla
I should mention that we reversed this order about a month ago, which may have been confusing to people. It was announced, but maybe not as widely as one might have liked. -Ekr On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Firefox currently treats the caller as the server and the cal

Re: DTLS-SRTP roles

2013-02-22 Thread Eric Rescorla
Firefox currently treats the caller as the server and the callee as the client. (This is the recommended configuration from 5763). Eventually we will do RFC 4572 roles as defined in RFC 5763/5764. -Ekr On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Mamadou Diop wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using Nightly "22.0a1

DTLS-SRTP roles

2013-02-22 Thread Mamadou Diop
Hello, I'm using Nightly "22.0a1 (2013-02-20)" and making call from chrome to FF through a gateway. The problem is that there is a role conflict in DTLS. FF is the called party but is sends "Client Hello" message. Our gateway uses rfc4145 to determine roles. If the remote party doesn't support thi