Re: Request for reviewers and super-reviewers to require more in-code documentation of new code

2012-09-14 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2012-09-14 15:02 -0700, Dave Hylands wrote: > > Again, the problem isn't these examples specifically -- the vast > > majority of B2G work I've seen has been un- or severely > > under-commented. > > So, I think it would also be good to have some pointers to > examples of well documented i

Valgrind builds on mozilla-central

2012-09-14 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
The Valgrind builds on mozilla-central have been red for as long as I remember. Does anyone care about them or should we just turn them off? Thanks! Ehsan ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/

Re: Request for reviewers and super-reviewers to require more in-code documentation of new code

2012-09-14 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 9/14/12 11:02 PM, Dave Hylands wrote:> So, I think it would also be good to have some pointers to examples of well documented idl files. Some possibilities: 1) http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/content/base/public/nsIImageLoadingContent.idl 2) Various things in netwerk/base/pu

Re: Request for reviewers and super-reviewers to require more in-code documentation of new code

2012-09-14 Thread Dave Hylands
Hey Justin, ...snip... > Again, the problem isn't these examples specifically -- the vast > majority of B2G work I've seen has been un- or severely > under-commented. So, I think it would also be good to have some pointers to examples of well documented idl files. Dave Hylands _

Re: Request for reviewers and super-reviewers to require more in-code documentation of new code

2012-09-14 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
+1. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Request for reviewers and super-reviewers to require more in-code documentation of new code

2012-09-14 Thread Justin Lebar
We've been adding a lot of new code lately, particularly as part of B2G. But we have not been adding high-level in-source documentation along with that code. The result is that it's becoming increasingly difficult to find one's way around our code. To be clear, my beef here isn't so much with a

Re: [FIXED] Re: Git mirror of mozilla-central down

2012-09-14 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 12-09-14 11:54 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On 12-09-14 10:51 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 08:41:19AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: OK, time for some good news. John Schoenick helped me yesterday on IRC to understand what has caused this issue and how to fix it. I tried that an

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendations: Multimodal Architecture, R2RML, rdb-direct-mapping

2012-09-14 Thread Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
(12/09/07 8:31), L. David Baron wrote: > (I'd actually be somewhat surprised if there's any interest in these > specifications in the Mozilla community, but I could be wrong.) Yes, you are wrong. I still maintain a general interest to RDF or the Semantic Web. I am just not doing anything relevant

Re: Git mirror of mozilla-central back up

2012-09-14 Thread Ralph Giles
On 12-09-14 8:56 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > This is a public service announcement to let you know that as of a few > minutes ago, I brought up the mozilla-central git mirror again. The > credit mostly goes to John Schoenick (johns) for telling me what was > wrong, and even giving me a script to fi

Git mirror of mozilla-central back up

2012-09-14 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
This is a public service announcement to let you know that as of a few minutes ago, I brought up the mozilla-central git mirror again. The credit mostly goes to John Schoenick (johns) for telling me what was wrong, and even giving me a script to fix it. You can still find your favorite repo h

Re: [FIXED] Re: Git mirror of mozilla-central down

2012-09-14 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 12-09-14 10:51 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 08:41:19AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: OK, time for some good news. John Schoenick helped me yesterday on IRC to understand what has caused this issue and how to fix it. I tried that and it indeed fixed the problem. I'm currentl

Re: [FIXED] Re: Git mirror of mozilla-central down

2012-09-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 08:41:19AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > OK, time for some good news. John Schoenick helped me yesterday on > IRC to understand what has caused this issue and how to fix it. I > tried that and it indeed fixed the problem. I'm currently in the > process of converting the r

[FIXED] Re: Git mirror of mozilla-central down

2012-09-14 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
OK, time for some good news. John Schoenick helped me yesterday on IRC to understand what has caused this issue and how to fix it. I tried that and it indeed fixed the problem. I'm currently in the process of converting the rest of the repo to get to the current tip of mozilla-central, which

Re: Git mirror of mozilla-central down

2012-09-14 Thread cjacek
> Unfortunately I don't have enough time for now to work on this even more, > so you should not expect any more updates to the mozilla-central mirror. I > may look at this again in the future and try other things that I can think > of (such as trying to narrow down the failure range even further,

Re: Git mirror of mozilla-central down

2012-09-14 Thread Ben Hearsum
On 09/13/12 05:49 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > In the mean time, if you've been using this mirror and want to continue > using git, you may give this mirror a try: > https://github.com/mozilla/releases-mozilla-central. There are a few > downsides of doing so which you should be aware of: > > * This