Re: Error on startup when registering content policy from bootstrapped extension

On Sunday, May 12, 2013 5:54:04 PM UTC+2, Neil wrote: > browsers don't load documents, doc shells do. So, my question is again, > where's the doc shell that's loading the about:blank? Ah, I see your point. Maybe it's there but not associated with the boxobject yet? __

Re: Error on startup when registering content policy from bootstrapped extension

Matthew Gertner wrote: On Sunday, May 12, 2013 5:54:04 PM UTC+2, Neil wrote: browsers don't load documents, doc shells do. So, my question is again, where's the doc shell that's loading the about:blank? Ah, I see your point. Maybe it's there but not associated with the boxobject yet?

No DOM bindings meeting this week

Due to the MoCo meeting the DOM bindings meeting for this week is cancelled. - Kyle ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Cannot cycle collect if GC has not run first!

I am using a third party framework in my application on MAC. Third party framework uses mozilla 4.0 to display some web pages. The application is giving me following error(EXC_BAD_ACCESS) when I debug it using xcode 4.3 attached. STACK Trace- libmozalloc.dylib`mozalloc_abort(char const*): 0x1

Re: Windows 7 test jobs running on iX

The intermittent failures on consecutive changesets were not as bad as I first thought. This week we should have the jobs be running across all branches. IT should have the machines ready between Tuesday to Wednesday. cheers, Armen On 2013-05-09 3:20 PM, Armen Zambrano G. wrote: Hi all, We ha

Re: Cannot cycle collect if GC has not run first!

That's really strange. I don't know why you'd end up with that when running it one way but not the other. Andrew - Original Message - > I am using a third party framework in my application on MAC. > > Third party framework uses mozilla 4.0 to display some web pages. The > application i

converting CPPSRCS to moz.build

Hi all, I'd like to reserve Wednesday morning starting at 6am PDT to close central/inbound/birch to get the CPPSRCS moz.build conversion (bug 864774) landed and in each branch. (I tried to land it on inbound this weekend, but it didn't go so well). Let me know if this timeslot will cause any

Re: converting CPPSRCS to moz.build

On 5/13/13 9:08 AM, Mike Shal wrote: Hi all, I'd like to reserve Wednesday morning starting at 6am PDT to close central/inbound/birch to get the CPPSRCS moz.build conversion (bug 864774) landed and in each branch. (I tried to land it on inbound this weekend, but it didn't go so well). I don't

Re: Help with migrating to clang 3.3

Nathan has volunteered to help with this. Thanks, Nathan! -- Ehsan On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2013-05-10 1:06 PM, Justin Lebar wrote: > >> If we wanted to check out the RC from svn, is that trunk, or is it one >> of the branches? It's

Follow-up on the Windows PGO issue

As a follow-up from the previous thread on this subject, last week I met with some of the Microsoft compiler folks, and they were really helpful. I filed bug 871712 about the best short term work-around for this issue that they were suggesting. I will post an update to this list when I can share

Re: converting CPPSRCS to moz.build

On 2013-05-13 12:22 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: On 5/13/13 9:08 AM, Mike Shal wrote: Hi all, I'd like to reserve Wednesday morning starting at 6am PDT to close central/inbound/birch to get the CPPSRCS moz.build conversion (bug 864774) landed and in each branch. (I tried to land it on inbound this

Re: converting CPPSRCS to moz.build

On 5/13/2013 4:08 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: I don't see the downside of a very short tree closure. It is our common way of doing large scale stuff like this across the codebase. Agreed, no sense in tempting fate. Besides, 6am PT is a time where there's both good sheriff coverage and low activ

Re: OS.File and shutdown

On 5/10/13 10:45 PM, Felipe Gomes wrote: > Hi, does OS.File guarantees that write tasks that have started will be > completed if a shutdown occurs? My use case is for writeAtomic but I'm > interested about the behavior of both write and writeAtomic. > Corner case: what if I call write/writeAtomic

Re: Cannot cycle collect if GC has not run first!

Andrew, But what's the reason it is coming? Why Garbage Collector is not run? On Monday, 13 May 2013 21:25:42 UTC+5:30, Andrew McCreight wrote: > That's really strange. I don't know why you'd end up with that when running > it one way but not the other. > > > > Andrew > > > > - Orig