Re: Reparenting a XulRunnner window in a Firefox Window

2013-07-03 Thread Benjamin Smedberg
On 7/2/2013 11:34 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: The Firefox OS Simulator is a XulRunner instance run from Firefox. Two processes, two windows, two different version of gecko. It would be very useful if we could display the simulator as part of Firefox. Inside a tab. I'm interested in know why this wou

Re: Replacing Gecko's URL parser

2013-07-03 Thread Bobby Holley
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > We do not want >> >> url = new URL(rel, base) >> >> to differ across engines for any rel or base >> > > I don't understand why it matters. chrome: and resource: are both > gecko-specific extensions and we have no desire to standardize them

Re: Replacing Gecko's URL parser

2013-07-03 Thread Benjamin Smedberg
On 7/3/2013 2:49 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: Both resource: and chrome: have host names and need to support relative URIs. Neither of them is a candidate for standardization, though. We should just add them as special known schemes in o

Re: Web MIDI API, was Re: Making proposal for API exposure official

2013-07-03 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Marcos Caceres (mailto:mcace...@mozilla.com)> wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > > I'd like someone with experience implementing and maintaining AP

Re: Web MIDI API, was Re: Making proposal for API exposure official

2013-07-03 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > I think we should try. So, we should try to have someone carve out some > > time to review Web MIDI, at least to the point where we feel confident it > > would make sense

Web MIDI API, was Re: Making proposal for API exposure official

2013-07-03 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > I think we should try. So, we should try to have someone carve out some > time to review Web MIDI, at least to the point where we feel confident it > would make sense to implement. I've been heavily involved with Web MIDI for a

Re: Reparenting a XulRunnner window in a Firefox Window

2013-07-03 Thread Paul Rouget
Jim Mathies wrote: > You could do that on Windows, although it would be a bit of a hack. > I don't think it's something we would consider checking into the > tree. I would be part of the simulator code (addon). > -Original Message- From: Paul Rouget > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 4:10 A

Re: Reparenting a XulRunnner window in a Firefox Window

2013-07-03 Thread Jim Mathies
You could do that on Windows, although it would be a bit of a hack. I don't think it's something we would consider checking into the tree. Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Rouget Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 4:10 AM To: Jim Mathies Cc: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: Re

Re: Reparenting a XulRunnner window in a Firefox Window

2013-07-03 Thread Paul Rouget
Jim Mathies wrote: > For Windows there is only one window (the main desktop window that > contains the content tabs and chrome) so reparenting probably isn't > an option. The one exception to this is with plugins, which own > their own child window, but I don’t think you want to mess with > that.