Re: Using C++0x auto

2013-07-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:50:55PM -0700, Justin Lebar wrote: We can't require any c++11 feature until we drop support for gcc 4.4. [...] there are problems in the gcc 4.4 system headers that make using c++11 mode impossible (except on b2g/android). Is there any reason to support gcc 4.4

Re: Using C++0x auto

2013-07-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 01:15:31PM -0700, Kyle Huey wrote: We've dropped support for versions of MSVC prior to 2010, and we're requiring at least GCC 4.4. According to [0] that means we should be able to use *auto*. Anybody know any reasons why we can't start using it? Filed bug 894242.

i2space introduces B2B Travel Portal with API Integration

2013-07-16 Thread i2space
I2space technologies is leading online travel portal that sells travel related products and services to potential clients. We provide b2b travel portal, travel portal api, and travel portal white label in India at very affordable rates. For more details please contact us at 9052266440 /

Double-click test

2013-07-16 Thread Neil
How do I write a test for a double-click event, or does anyone know an existing test that I can cargo-cult from? -- Warning: May contain traces of nuts. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Shutting off leak tests?

2013-07-16 Thread Steven Michaud
Steven, anyone else that can take a look at this mac bug? Not that I'm aware of. And are we sure this *is* a Mac bug? I've never seen anything like it in any other context, so I think this is most likely to be a tests bug. So the best person to look at it is probably someone who knows a lot

Running talos through mozharness

2013-07-16 Thread Armen Zambrano G.
Hi, We have recently been working hard to separate the buildbot logic that runs our talos jobs on tbpl to its own separate script (using mozharness). [1][2] This has the advantage of permitting anyone (specially the a-team) to adjust how our harnesses run talos inside of our infrastructure

Re: Generic data update service?

2013-07-16 Thread Gervase Markham
On 15/07/13 14:57, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: Or it means that we need to be willing to issue dot-releases to update these items. We're pretty nimble with the desktop release cycle already. We should definitely measure this tradeoff before doing a bunch of engineering on this. As I understand

Re: Double-click test

2013-07-16 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2013-07-16 6:52 AM, Neil wrote: How do I write a test for a double-click event, or does anyone know an existing test that I can cargo-cult from? synthesizeMouse(element, x, y, {clickCount: 2}, window); should do it. Cheers, Ehsan ___

Do you consider to port mp3 support on Windows XP

2013-07-16 Thread Ludovic Chenneberg
I'm working on a html 5 interactive player that 100% compatible with Chrome from XP to Window 8. I Saw that the support of mp3 and mp4 has been introduced in firefox on v21 for win 7 and v22 for Vista. Do you consider to port these formats on Windows XP?

Re: Do you consider to port mp3 support on Windows XP

2013-07-16 Thread Ralph Giles
On 13-07-16 11:15 AM, Ludovic Chenneberg wrote: I'm working on a html 5 interactive player that 100% compatible with Chrome from XP to Window 8. I Saw that the support of mp3 and mp4 has been introduced in firefox on v21 for win 7 and v22 for Vista. Porting mp3 playback support to WinXP is

Re: Shutting off leak tests?

2013-07-16 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
It's not exactly a knee jerk reaction. We discussed this quite a while ago as I mentioned earlier and there were more arguments in favor of turning these off. It's just that the work was never done. And in the mean time we have got much more useful test suites, such as AWSY which actually help

Re: running tests in HiDPI mode on the build machines

2013-07-16 Thread Georg Fritzsche
On 11.07.2013, at 09:11, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote: This proposal is just to affect how content is rendered, by setting that pref. If it's a XUL UI it should render at the higher resolution. It wouldn't cause native UI to be rendered differently. I don't really know how we'd

Three RDFa-related W3C Proposed (Edited) Recommendations

2013-07-16 Thread L. David Baron
The W3C has released three RDFA-related documents, one proposed recommendation: HTML+RDFa 1.1: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-html-rdfa-20130625/ and two proposed edited recommendations (which contain only editorial changes): RDFa 1.1 Core: