Our (ostensibly) weekly DOM bindings meetings continue on Monday August
26th at 12:30 PM PDT.
Meeting details:
* Monday, August 26, 2013, 12:30 PM PDT (3:30 PM EDT/9:30 PM CEST)
* Conference room 7-N, San Francisco office, 7th floor.
* Dial-in Info:
- Vidyo room: Boris Zbarsky
- In office or
I talked to gps today and told him I would let him know my numbers on my
machine. I will share them with everybody:
My Win32 debug clobber build (mach build after mach clobber) was 39:54.84
today, up from ~33:00 a few months ago. Not sure if it is my system.
Immediate rebuild (no-op) was
On 08/25/2013 12:05 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Note that the code itself (and not just its size) being compiled can also
change the compilation time, as the compiler needs to perform things such
as template instantiation, Koenig name look-ups, etc. Those factors will
not change by reducing the
On 2013-08-26 6:16 PM, Mike Shal wrote:
On 08/25/2013 12:05 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Note that the code itself (and not just its size) being compiled can also
change the compilation time, as the compiler needs to perform things such
as template instantiation, Koenig name look-ups, etc. Those
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 06:23:09PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-08-26 6:16 PM, Mike Shal wrote:
On 08/25/2013 12:05 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Note that the code itself (and not just its size) being compiled can also
change the compilation time, as the compiler needs to perform things
On 8/26/13 6:31 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
Not necessarily. You can take that as being exactly the point being
made, and it has some value. If your preprocessed source is 40 times
bigger than the plain source, there might be something wrong.
Mmm...
We pretty commonly have files whose .i is 40x
6 matches
Mail list logo
