Re: How to reduce the time m-i is closed?

2013-11-17 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:17 AM, smaug sm...@welho.com wrote: the recent OOM cases have been really annoying. They have slowed down development, even for those who haven't been dealing with the actual issue(s). Could we handle this kind of cases differently. Perhaps clone the bad state of

Re: Unified builds

2013-11-17 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Ms2ger ms2...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/14/2013 11:49 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: I've started to work on a project in my spare time to switch us to use unified builds for C/C++ compilation. The way that unified builds work is by using the UNIFIED_SOURCES instead

Re: Unified builds

2013-11-17 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Gabriele Svelto gsve...@mozilla.comwrote: On 14/11/2013 23:49, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: The advantage of this is that it speeds up the compilation (I've measured between 6-15x speed improvement depending on the code in question locally.) Another advantage

Re: Unified builds

2013-11-17 Thread L. David Baron
On Sunday 2013-11-17 16:45 -0800, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote: I've started to work on a project in my spare time to switch us to use unified builds for C/C++ compilation. The way that unified builds work is by using

A second trees were closed due to OOMs post-mortem

2013-11-17 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
Hi, As you probably know, we just had a second (in a matter of weeks) prolonged tree closure due to tests OOMing. The post-mortem for the last tree closure (https://etherpad.mozilla.org/mEB0H50ZjX) was quite satisfactory... basically we fixed some leaks, tweaked some silly tests, and know how to

Re: Unified builds

2013-11-17 Thread Benoit Jacob
Here is a wiki page to track our progress on this front and our means of synchronizing on this work: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/Porting_to_unified_sources Benoit 2013/11/14 Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com I've started to work on a project in my spare time to switch us to use

Re: Manually or Programmatically set geo.wifi.uri for testing purposes

2013-11-17 Thread Doug Turner
I think we fixed this with: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/49e797ce0f22 On Nov 14, 2013, at 9:34 AM, John Cook johncook...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to manually or programmatically set the geo.wifi.uri for testing purposes. I've tried to do this several different ways to

Re: Manually or Programmatically set geo.wifi.uri for testing purposes

2013-11-17 Thread Kevin Brosnan
Which would be in Firefox 27 http://aurora.mozilla.org for a download link. Kevin Brosnan On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Doug Turner doug.tur...@gmail.com wrote: I think we fixed this with: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/49e797ce0f22 On Nov 14, 2013, at 9:34 AM, John

Re: Manually or Programmatically set geo.wifi.uri for testing purposes

2013-11-17 Thread Josh Matthews
In particular, this should be fixed in Firefox 27 (currently on Aurora). On 11/18/2013 11:36 AM, Doug Turner wrote: I think we fixed this with: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/49e797ce0f22 On Nov 14, 2013, at 9:34 AM, John Cook johncook...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to