Hi,
So far, nobody said that the idea was either stupid or impossible/impractical,
so I went ahead and filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=961689
David
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
As far as I know this has not be set up, but it is definitely a good idea. I
filed bug 961707.
Cheers,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Chris Pearce cpea...@mozilla.com
To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 11:11:47 PM
Subject: Re: CPP_UNIT_TESTS being removed
On 1/17/14 1:24 PM, Terrence Cole wrote:
SpiderMonkey will no longer scan the stack for live roots; you must now
wrap all GC thing pointers that live on the stack across a GC in the
JS::Rooted template for SpiderMonkey to see them. See the comments in
js/public/RootingAPI.h and the guide on the
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Jim Blandy j...@mozilla.com wrote:
I've never heard of a major project escaping from conservative GC once it
had entered that state of sin; nor have I heard of anyone implementing a
moving collector after starting with a non-moving collector.
There's no better
Hi,
Currently in gecko we have code to determine if text being drawn into a
transparent surface has opaque content underneath it. In the case where
it doesn't we ask moz2d/cairo [1] to disable subpixel AA text rendering
for this surface since it can have poor results depending on what the
On 1/18/2014, 12:19 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anybody think of other similar techniques which we can adopt to improve
our story here? Suggestions on WebIDL annotations, code changes,
documentation, etc. are
Hi,
I have some questions, and would be nice if someone could answer. I will really
appreciate.
* Mozilla will not provide more Xulrunner builds (runtime)?
* If not, developers will be able to compile Xulrunner builds from Mozilla code?
* Will Mozilla continues the Xulrunner development?
* What
7 matches
Mail list logo
