On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Birunthan Mohanathas
birunt...@mohanathas.com wrote:
Bugs 900903 and 900908 introduced variadic variants of
NS_IMPL_ISUPPORTS, NS_IMPL_QUERY_INTERFACE, NS_IMPL_CYCLE_COLLECTION,
etc. and removed the old numbered macros.
Cool. Is there a script that rewrites mq
Le jeudi 24 avril 2014 10:51:12 UTC+2, Nicholas Nethercote a écrit :
I've given the list of current start-up
(+30s) modules below.
This list contains several compartments for XPCOM components handling the
command line (eg. nsSetDefaultBrowser.js or nsDefaultCLH.js). I wouldn't expect
them
Birunthan Mohanathas wrote:
Note that due to technical details, the new macros will reject uses with zero
variadic arguments. In such cases, you will want to continue to use the
zero-numbered macro, e.g. NS_IMPL_ISUPPORTS0(nsFoo).
I can't help wondering who would need to implement only
2014-04-28 0:18 GMT-04:00 Birunthan Mohanathas birunt...@mohanathas.com:
Bugs 900903 and 900908 introduced variadic variants of
NS_IMPL_ISUPPORTS, NS_IMPL_QUERY_INTERFACE, NS_IMPL_CYCLE_COLLECTION,
etc. and removed the old numbered macros. So, instead of e.g.
NS_IMPL_ISUPPORTS2(nsFoo, nsIBar,
On 2014-04-28, 8:59 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
New question:
We have various scriptable nsIFoo stuff (e.g. nsIParserService,
nsIScriptableUConv) on the fringes of Gecko for use by mailnews, the
Firefox UI or extensions. Since Gaia doesn't use XPCOM, those things
are dead code in B2G, right? Would
2014-04-28 14:18 GMT-04:00 Trevor Saunders trev.saund...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:07:07PM -0400, Benoit Jacob wrote:
2014-04-28 12:17 GMT-04:00 Birunthan Mohanathas
birunt...@mohanathas.com:
On 28 April 2014 14:18, Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.com wrote:
Question:
On 28/04/14 21:00, Paolo Amadini wrote:
On 4/28/2014 7:44 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
Based on all discussion to this point, I'm proposing this low-level API:
fileObject.setPermissions(options);
OS.File.setPermissions(path, options);
Generally, this looks good to me. I'd rather use unix
Neil n...@parkwaycc.co.uk wrote:
I can't help wondering who would need to implement only nsISupports. It
can't be for the refcounting, because you can just use inline
refcounting. And you've got no way of telling whether an arbitrary
nsISupports is your object or not.
Well, except that in
8 matches
Mail list logo