On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Kip Gilbert wrote:
> While beginning implementation I noticed that there is smooth
> scrolling functionality already implemented within
> ScrollFrameHelper::AsyncScroll, using simple splines via
> nsSMILKeySpline. This smooth scrolling behavior is used internall
> If C++ wants a default, just package Cairo (or something else) as a library
> alongside Clang/LLVM or GCC.
I think that's largely what's being proposed!
Cheers,
Botond
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.
> Why put this into core C++? Why not leave it to libraries?
The standard library is a library :)
One of the biggest criticisms C++ faces is that its standard library is
very narrow in scope compared to other languages like Java or C#, and thus
programmers often have to turn to third-party librar
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Rik Cabanier"
> > > To: "Benoit Jacob"
> > > Cc: "Botond Ballo" , "dev-platform" <
> > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org>, "Jet Villegas"
> > >
> > > Sent: Mond
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Benoit Jacob
> wrote:
> > I would like the C++ committee's attention to be drawn to the dangers, for
> > committee, to try to make decisions outside of its domain of expertise. I
> > see more potential for harm than for good in having
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While beginning implementation I noticed that there is smooth
scrolling functionality already implemented within
ScrollFrameHelper::AsyncScroll, using simple splines via
nsSMILKeySpline. This smooth scrolling behavior is used internally
and not expose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The bug has been split up to track individual parts of the implementation:
Bug 1010538 - Implement CSSOM-View scroll-behavior CSS property
Bug 1022818 - Implement CSSOM-View smooth scrolling DOM Methods
Bug 1022825 - Implement CSSOM-View smooth scroll
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Benoit Jacob
wrote:
> I would like the C++ committee's attention to be drawn to the dangers, for
> committee, to try to make decisions outside of its domain of expertise. I
> see more potential for harm than for good in having the C++ committee join
> the ranks of n
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 12:31:39PM -0700, Botond Ballo wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Here are some C++ standards proposals from the latest committee mailing
> that I think might be of interest to the Mozilla community:
>
>
> Portable C++ ABI:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2
Tomorrow (Wed June 11th) we're starting short weekly sync-ups on our
Service Worker efforts with a primary focus on offline functionality for
the web.
*Where*: WebAPI Vidyo room
*When*: see this URL for the time in your timezone:
http://arewemeetingyet.com/Toronto/2014-06-11/11:00/w/Offline%20s
There's this bug filed about user overrides for CSPs:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1014545
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
11 matches
Mail list logo