On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Doug Turner wrote:
>>
>> I doubt that's what roc was suggesting. But it's hard to say more without
>> more details on the said overall strategy.
>>
>
> I think this is an interesting idea and we should look into how much effort
> it is to add support for this usb
On 10/21/14 8:28 PM, Doug Turner wrote:
And, I think we can go a long way in fixing the password problem without having
to depend on custom hardware. I’d like to see us invest in fixing/improving
our built-in password manager and autofill in Firefox. Many 3rd party password
managers have mad
>
> I doubt that's what roc was suggesting. But it's hard to say more without
> more details on the said overall strategy.
>
I think this is an interesting idea and we should look into how much effort it
is to add support for this usb security key.
And, I think we can go a long way in fixing
> some things that I've seen that we'd probably like to see end up in the
> language include.
>
> ...
> - ability to say classes should only be used on stack / heap or not used
> in one of those
There's a proposal in the pre-Urbana mailing for something related: the
ability to say that a class
On 21/10/2014 21:00, Chris AtLee wrote:
Hi,
Just a quick note that we're hoping to enable 64-bit windows builds &
tests across most trunk branches this week. This includes branches such
as mozilla-central, mozilla-inbound, fx-team, etc.
In order to get adequate test coverage without at the same
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Chris AtLee wrote:
>
> Just a quick note that we're hoping to enable 64-bit windows builds & tests
> across most trunk branches this week. This includes branches such as
> mozilla-central, mozilla-inbound, fx-team, etc.
Excellent news! Thank you.
Nick
___
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
> > On Oct 21, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
> >
> >
> http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.co.nz/2014/10/strengthening-2-step-verification-with.html
> > We should support this.
>
> Maybe I'm just jaded, but given that we're
> On Oct 21, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
> http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.co.nz/2014/10/strengthening-2-step-verification-with.html
> We should support this.
Maybe I'm just jaded, but given that we're currently in the process of phasing
out custom APIs for one specialize
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Robert O'Callahan
wrote:
>
> http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.co.nz/2014/10/strengthening-2-step-verification-with.html
> We should support this.
Agreed. There's https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1065729 filed
for this...
http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.co.nz/2014/10/strengthening-2-step-verification-with.html
We should support this.
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomo
Hi,
Just a quick note that we're hoping to enable 64-bit windows builds &
tests across most trunk branches this week. This includes branches such
as mozilla-central, mozilla-inbound, fx-team, etc.
In order to get adequate test coverage without at the same time
overwhelming our windows test i
Hi,
I am working on a project that involves text to speech conversion.
Currently, I am getting a WAV file of the audio with bitrate of 353 Kbps
and sampling rate of 22.0 KHz. Apparently, this audio is not supported on
the Firefox OS device (Flame with FFOS 2.0).
I got the list of audio supported
12 matches
Mail list logo
