On 24/11/2014 8:40 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
On 11/24/14 1:43 AM, Mark Hammond wrote:
* Is Components.returnCode expected to be used when the code throws (as
SessionStore.jsm does) or when the code returns without an exception?
(Or maybe both?)
* If it is supposed to be used with a normal retu
Note: new meeting time!
The next Memshrink meeting is is brought to you by better accounting for GFx
surface cache entries:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096913
The wiki page for this meeting is at:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance/MemShrink
Agenda:
* Prioritize unpriorit
> As usual I will blog about the meeting after it's over.
Lots of exciting things happened during this meeting! My blog post
summarizing them is now online [1].
Cheers,
Botond
[1]
http://theres-waldo.ca/2014/11/23/trip-report-c-standards-meeting-in-urbana-champaign-november-2014/
_
On 11/24/14, 4:40 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
Personally I'd prefer if the JS component could just throw and not have
to use Components.returnCode at all, isn't there a way the caller can
catch the exception without it being logged?
There is. The question is _when_ it should do this. Consider
On 11/24/2014 6:16 AM, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do we have policy about what headers should/could be in EXPORTS? I found
> that some exported headers include other headers that aren't exported so
> the header using site has to use LOCAL_INCLUDES which IMO defeats the
> purpose of EXPORTS.
Hi,
Do we have policy about what headers should/could be in EXPORTS? I found
that some exported headers include other headers that aren't exported so
the header using site has to use LOCAL_INCLUDES which IMO defeats the
purpose of EXPORTS.
So exporting more headers could fix it, but that leads to
On 11/24/14 1:43 AM, Mark Hammond wrote:
> * Is Components.returnCode expected to be used when the code throws (as
> SessionStore.jsm does) or when the code returns without an exception?
> (Or maybe both?)
>
> * If it is supposed to be used with a normal return, is the change so
> GetPendingResult
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Patrick McManus wrote:
> Hi -
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>>
>>
>> Indeed. Huge thanks to everyone who is making Let's Encrypt happen.
>>
>> > regulatory compliance,
>>
>> What's this about?
>
>
> nosslsearch.google.com is an example
8 matches
Mail list logo