Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
On 1/8/2015 10:05 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
I'm revisiting our docs in light of this to figure out what our real
minimum hardware/ram/disk requirements are. The temptation to start
adding "If you try to build Firefox with 2 gigs of RAM, you're gonna
have a bad time" memes
I just landed bug 1118486 which removes the MOZ_DELETE macro. Please use
`= delete` instead.
Cheers,
--
Ehsan
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
XUL is explicitly not implemented at all in Chrome, so I would not count on
it being implemented in any form.
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:32 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo)
wrote:
> Does anybody have the intention to implement the things like XUL:tree
> in HTML5 with power functional.
> Such as
Does anybody have the intention to implement the things like XUL:tree
in HTML5 with power functional.
Such as scroll by pixel, and each cell can be either or
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bugzilla@Mozilla
Date: 2015-01-09 5:34 GMT+08:00
Subject: [Bug 441414] Treerows need a wa
I think the question is rather if there is an interest to create a
HTML5-equivalent of the XUL tree that has a similar or matching feature set.
The main features required are being able to handle a datastore that has
10k+ rows by lazy loading (and unloading) the data into DOM nodes,
hierarchical d
HTML5 spec used to have something like that called
Here's some info:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26545
As a former contributor to XUL tree widget, I would love to see a
similar widget in HTML5.
Jan
On 09/01/15 19:18, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
I think the question is rather if there
On 2015-01-09 8:59 AM, Neil wrote:
2GB builds, although I expect it's on the slow side. 1GB isn't enough
though, unless you enable shared gkmedias and js (and shared js builds
are broken anyway because we don't link to js when we should).
1GB is the bare minimum require to run VS2013 Communi
On 1/9/2015 1:17 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
I'm curious what the real disk space minimums are for Linux? Those
numbers haven't been updated in a while, looks like.
The most disk-heavy build configuration uses 7-10GB of disk space for
srcdir + objdir; the least probably 2-3GB.
--
Joshua Cranmer
T
I recommend a 4+ physical core Ivy Bridge or newer i5/i7 CPU, 8+ GB of RAM
(16 GB preferred), and an SSD. If you work for Mozilla and don't have that
(e.g. you are building on a MacBook Air), please order a new machine right
now.
Anyone with less is going to have a bad time. I'm inclined to consid
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 3:16:20 AM UTC+1, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
> Or, if it tickles your fancy, it may be simpler at this point to list
> the C++11 features not yet usable:
> - ref qualifiers on methods
> - member initializers
> - templated aliasing
> - C++11 attributes (although many of t
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Emanuel Hoogeveen <
emanuel.hoogev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 3:16:20 AM UTC+1, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
> > Or, if it tickles your fancy, it may be simpler at this point to list
> > the C++11 features not yet usable:
> > - ref qualifiers
This has now re-landed and stuck. GCC 4.4 running in automation is
officially a thing of the past \m/
-Ryan
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
12 matches
Mail list logo
