On 2015/02/03 15:24, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:27:52PM +0900, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
>> I did a non-unified build and saw the expected failure.
>> This is a summary of what I saw.
>>
>> Background:
>>
>> I may need to modify and debug basic I/O routines on local PC, and so
>>
Test Informant report for 2015-02-01.
State of test manifests at revision 940118b1adcd.
Using revision fa91879c8428 as a baseline for comparisons.
Showing tests enabled or disabled between 2015-01-25 and 2015-02-01.
85% of tests across all suites and configurations are enabled.
Summary
---
# The Content Vault
The purpose of this document is to gather your comments about the feasibility
of the idea of a Content Vault (CV). After gathering your comments, a more
formal RFC will be drafted.
I’d like to use your comments to colour the proposal, from a platform, security
and privacy p
On 01/02/2015 13:18, Howard Chu wrote:
> People may say I'm biased since I'm the author of LMDB but I have only
> ever posted objective, reproducible comparisons of LMDB to other
> alternatives. http://symas.com/mdb/#bench
>
> If your typical record sizes are smaller than 1KB and you have more
> w
This kind of feature comes up frequently, but to the best of my knowledge
(which
I believe is fairly up to date) it is not known how to build a robust
version of this.
To generalize the problem a bit, we have two pieces of software running on
the
user's computer:
A: A confined process running in
Yes!
Can we also expose this to certified apps so that our Gaia developers can
start experimenting with using grids?
/ Jonas
On Feb 2, 2015 2:25 PM, "Mats Palmgren" wrote:
> Summary:
> CSS Grid defines a two-dimensional grid-based layout system, optimized for
> user interface design. In the gri
It would be helpful if you could comment more on the use cases here. It's not
entirely clear to me what's motivating this proposal. In your message, the
"Inline" use case seems to have been truncated, and the "Mobile Applications"
use case seems perfectly well addressed by iframes.
Let's focu
Hi Olivier,
I agree with ekr and Richard. There has been a lot of research lately about
how to do personalization in a privacy-preserving manner.
Bloom Cookies: Web Search Personalization without User Tracking, NDSS 2015
http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/238114/BloomCookies.pdf
RePriv: Re-Imagi
Looping in Deian, who was working (is working?) on something like this.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Monica Chew wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> I agree with ekr and Richard. There has been a lot of research lately about
> how to do personalization in a privacy-preserving manner.
>
> Bloom Cookies:
Today's Memshrink meeting is is brought to you by areweslimyet.com:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1100253
The wiki page for this meeting is at:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance/MemShrink
Agenda:
* Prioritize unprioritized MemShrink bugs.
* Discuss how we measure progress.
*
On 02/03/2015 04:51 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Can we also expose this to certified apps so that our Gaia developers can
start experimenting with using grids?
There isn't any useful layout code in the tree yet. The ETA for
anything that's worth experimenting with is still 3-4 weeks or so.
I thi
Hi Monica,
Thanks for your comments. We've been thinking about this for a while. Yes, we
are very familiar with this work, but the setting is a little different. In
RePriv, for example, we had to analyze the personalization code which is fine
for research idea but won't work so well in practic
All work was completed on Monday and services fully restored. If you are
experiencing any issues, please contact #vcs.
NOTE: if you use the remote git.mozilla.org/integration/gecko-dev.git
please keep reading.
If you use this particular remote, and pulled during the problem window
(roughly J
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
> On 02/03/2015 04:51 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> Can we also expose this to certified apps so that our Gaia developers can
>> start experimenting with using grids?
>
> There isn't any useful layout code in the tree yet. The ETA for
> anyth
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Ben Livshits wrote:
> Looking forward to hearing more from Deian! I wonder if Bobby means the
> COWL paper. Best.
>
Yes. There was ongoing research after the COWL paper by the Stanford team.
The last time I spoke with them about it was in August, so I don't know
Looking forward to hearing more from Deian! I wonder if Bobby means the COWL
paper. Best.
-Ben
Sent from a mobile device
On Feb 3, 2015, at 10:40, Bobby Holley
mailto:bobbyhol...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Looping in Deian, who was working (is working?) on something like this.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at
Hi all,
We are still working on COWL on two fronts. First, I am currently
drafting up the FPWD for COWL. Second, we also started thinking about
COWL in the context of extensions, which I ma share some similarities
with the proposed CV. A draft position paper of this is available [1],
but we also
On Tuesday 2015-02-03 19:40 +, Mats Palmgren wrote:
> On 02/03/2015 04:51 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >Can we also expose this to certified apps so that our Gaia developers can
> >start experimenting with using grids?
>
> There isn't any useful layout code in the tree yet. The ETA for
> anythi
18 matches
Mail list logo
