I have a function call that would cause
a series of synchronous
listeners to be called,
And I want to know which call is the most
time consuming. What I need to do?
--
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev
Hi,
As of Firefox 42 (Desktop only), the Push API [1] will be turned on by default.
This API allows an active service worker to receive server-sent push messages
in the background. The worker can then show a notification to the user, or
perform updates.
Push has been developed behind the `dom.
Correction: the presentation is tomorrow, Tuesday August 11th (not the 10th)
On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 5:25:33 PM UTC-4, Vladan D wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tuesday August 10th, Anthony Zhang will do a brief end-of-internship
> presentation showing how you can answer your questions with Telemetr
Hi all,
On Tuesday August 10th, Anthony Zhang will do a brief end-of-internship
presentation showing how you can answer your questions with Telemetry
dashboards [1] and Telemetry custom analyses [2].
*I'd like to invite you to tune in to Air Mozilla tomorrow for intern
presentations, especially i
Just got number from Brendan Colloran. On 2/15/15, there were 14772800 active
users using x86_64 on Mac for FF, and 224400 using x86. x86 then is 1.5% of the
active users. Seems like a safe bet to drop 32-bit support.
Syd Polk
sp...@mozilla.com
+1-512-905-9904
irc: sydpolk
> On Aug 6, 2015,
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/05f6b5bc5b4b should have done
this. Please file a follow-up if your tree is up to date and things aren't
working.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Dave Townsend
wrote:
> Can we update the bootstrap script to install the necessary development
> files?
>
Can we update the bootstrap script to install the necessary development
files?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you've followed the recent discussion in the "GTK3 linux builds"
> thread, this will come with no surprise, but if not:
>
> - Next Linux nightly will ha
On 2015-08-10 6:07 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Andrew, could you simply pull this data directly from publicsuffix.org
and cache locally?
It does seem like an API in the browser could avoid a lot of work for
developers (and the potential for bugs). Though perhaps if
publicsuffix.org provided a
Hi everyone,
You can find below the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop
Manual QA team last week (Week 32: August 03 - August 07).
Additional details on the team's priorities last week, as well as the plans
for the current week can be found at:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/De
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Changing cookies seems unlikely to happen on any relevant timescale.
Yeah, I guess the question is whether we want to have an API and argue
with those that are opposed to it (from memory, at least Ryan Sleevi
and Adam Barth).
> Andrew, cou
On 10/08/15 08:22, Tim Guan-tin Chien wrote:
> The list "... changes a few times per month" [1]. What's the
> consequence of using an outdated list in the app?
It depends very much on what you are using the list for, and what
changes your copy doesn't have.
If you were using the list for setting
On 09/08/15 03:10, Andrew Sutherland wrote:
> On 08/08/2015 10:00 PM, Andrew Sutherland wrote:
>> Are there any plans to surface the contents of
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XPCOM/Reference/Interface/nsIEffectiveTLDService
>> from https://publicsuffix.org/ via a web-faci
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:59 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> Web Platform Working Group:
> http://www.w3.org/2015/07/web-platform-wg.html
>
> Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should
> say as part of this charter review.
Jeff Jaffe told me at one point that Mozilla is n
On 09/08/15 10:51, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> There is https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25865 which is
> about more formally defining eTLDs and perhaps even exposing an API.
> However, it's unclear whether exposing an API is a good thing. eTLDs
> are used for cookies, storage boundari
On 09/08/15 19:59, L. David Baron wrote:
> The Timed Media WG splits some of the media work that was happening
> in HTML (MSE, EME) into a separate group.
Do we see a risk here that this group will become captured by the
promoters of DRM, more than was possible when it was done in the HTML WG?
Ge
On 08/10/2015 03:12 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Andrew, could you simply pull this data directly from publicsuffix.org
and cache locally?
We don't need a new Web API to be created, no. I figured I'd just check
if there were pending plans for URL/URLUtils to expose this
functionality, or if it w
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Andrew Sutherland
>> wrote:
>>> Are there any plans to surface the contents of
>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XPCOM/Refer
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Andrew Sutherland
> wrote:
>> Are there any plans to surface the contents of
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XPCOM/Reference/Interface/nsIEffectiveTLDService
>> from https://publics
18 matches
Mail list logo
