On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:59 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
>> > The W3C is proposing revised charters for:
>> >
>> > Web Platform Working Group:
>> > http://www.w3.org/2015/07/web-platfo
Follow-up on this, since we now have two days remaining to respond to these
proposed charters.
If you still have strong opinions about the proposed Web Platform and Timed
Media Working Groups charters, please reply within 24 hours so we have the
opportunity to integrate your opinions into Mozilla'
If you built a custom dashboard and used telemetry.js [1] to query
telemetry.mozilla.org for histogram data, you'll need to switch your dash to a
newer library -- either the new telemetry.js library [2] (preferred option) or
our shim library [3].
This change is necessary because Telemetry is re
While deciding how much resources are available to complex
applications is far from an easy task, and one for which there's no
obvious best answer, at least not yet, I agree that giving developers
this bit of information is critical to enable exploring this space and
bring out the any remaining iss
FWIW, I also think we should implement this. The clamping seems like a
reasonable way to be conservative given the fingerprinting concerns.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Luke Wagner wrote:
> Since the original m.d.p thread on hardwareConcurrency last year:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/topi
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan
wrote:
> Yes, I think we should do this.
>
Happy to hear the positive responses.
I implemented a patch for this last year. Since the code is trivial, it
probably still applies: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008453
Yes, I think we should do this.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea
lurpr
.a war hsrer holsa rodv
I'm ok with implementing this. My biggest concern has always been
fingerprinting, and I think that we'll need some way to deal with
active (i.e. client-side) fingerprinting anyway, so I don't think this
makes a big difference either way.
/ Jonas
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Luke Wagner wrote
Since the original m.d.p thread on hardwareConcurrency last year:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mozilla.dev.platform/QnhfUVw9jCI/discussion
the landscape has shifted (as always) and I think we should reevaluate
and implement this feature.
What hasn't changed are the arguments, made in the or
Awesome, thanks for working to unify this stuff baku!
Can this stuff be applied to StackScopedClone (used by Cu.cloneInto etc),
which currently does this stuff manually in ExportHelpers.cpp?
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Andrea Marchesini
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In these days I landed quite a fe
> On 4 Sep 2015, at 22:43, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
> Henry, I would rather you attempt to address Ryan's point 5, namely:
>
> 5) just generates keys, and relies on
> application/x-x509-*-cert to install certificates. This MIME handling,
> unspecified but implemented by major browsers, represen
11 matches
Mail list logo
