On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:44:40PM -0700, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> The question is, do we fix that friction by making collaboration
> >> easier, or do we fix it by redu
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 04:24:45PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:44:40PM -0700, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The question is, do we fix t
On 27/10/2015 03:32, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Over the years I have gained a *ton* of experience in code that
interfaces with both Firefox and Thunderbird/SeaMonkey. I can't really
think of a single instance where I made a change in that code and it
broke something in Thunderbird and the breakage wa
On 27/10/2015 15:24, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:44:40PM -0700, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The question is, do we fix that friction by making col
BMO's SSL certificate expires on 2015/10/30, so please be advised we
will be installing a new one around 13:30 UTC on 2015/10/29 (9:30 am
EDT/6:30 am PDT).
The new fingerprint will be
7c:7a:c4:6c:91:3b:6b:89:cf:f2:8c:13:b8:02:c4:25:bd:1e:25:17
`mach hgsetup` will be patched as soon as the new ce
On 10/26/2015 10:33 PM, Mitchell Baker wrote:
I'm in the middle of a hectic business trip, so will write more while
i"m on the plane home tonight.
The first thing to figure out, as Doug said, is how much support the
project should provide Thunderbird. 5 minutes might be an obvious
yes, as no
On 10/27/15 3:17 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
[1] An example from just this morning is the emasculation of
nsIDOMWindow. It's clear at this point that all of our binary code has
to be linked into libxul
Why can you not use nsPIDOMWindow? If there are particular APIs it's
missing that you need,
On 10/27/2015 2:50 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/27/15 3:17 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
[1] An example from just this morning is the emasculation of
nsIDOMWindow. It's clear at this point that all of our binary code has
to be linked into libxul
Why can you not use nsPIDOMWindow? If there are
On 10/23/15 8:32 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
I support merging c-c into m-c.
For what it's worth, I do as well. Of course I also do some due
diligence about not breaking Thunderbird before landing patches, just
like I do for Firefox extensions and whatnot and I feel that that is
the mo
On 10/27/15 3:55 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
We did replace our uses with nsPIDOMWindow, but it's an example of an
API that can be used external to libxul being replaced with one that
can't be.
Just to be clear, we're happy to make things on nsPIDOMWindow virtual or
exported as needed to the e
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 3:58:07 AM UTC-4, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This has been discussed in the past, to no avail. I would like to reopen
> the discussion.
>
> Acknowledgment: this is heavily inspired from a list compiled by Joshua
> Cranmer, but please consider this *also* coming fr
11 matches
Mail list logo
