Re: W3C Candidate Recommendation: Performance Timeline Level 2

2016-12-10 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 12/10/16 8:35 AM, Valentin Gosu wrote: I had some patches posted in bug 1263722, but then I started working on other things, and I haven't been watching the spec in the mean time. I'll try to get the patches ready to land later next week, and I'll try to see if there are any relevant changes t

Re: W3C Candidate Recommendation: Performance Timeline Level 2

2016-12-10 Thread Valentin Gosu
I had some patches posted in bug 1263722, but then I started working on other things, and I haven't been watching the spec in the mean time. I'll try to get the patches ready to land later next week, and I'll try to see if there are any relevant changes the spec has made that affect our implementat

Re: Intent to ship: Presentation API on Fennec

2016-12-10 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 12/5/16 3:20 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote: Correct. Intent to ship has been sent on blink-dev. Chrome Android should follow. Do you have any idea what the timeframe is? The answers to these two questions is very similar. The spec allows to pass an array of URLs to the `PresentationRequest` con

Re: W3C Candidate Recommendation: Performance Timeline Level 2

2016-12-10 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 12/9/16 6:22 PM, L. David Baron wrote: Performance Timeline Level 2 W3C TR draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/performance-timeline-2/ W3C Editor's draft: https://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/ deadline: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 Has anyone on our end been tracking this work or implem