Re: Intent to implement: ScrollTimeline

2017-03-25 Thread zbraniecki
On Saturday, March 25, 2017 at 8:02:36 PM UTC+1, Botond Ballo wrote: > What you describe sounds like other types of timelines, linked to user > gestures. There is mention of that on the wiki [1] [2], but no > concrete proposal that I'm aware of. I would imagine contributions to > the development o

Re: Intent to implement: ScrollTimeline

2017-03-25 Thread Botond Ballo
> Is it possible to use this, or is there a similar proposal, for linking > animation timeline to other user-controlled means of interacting with the UI? > > I'm thinking primarily about things like: > > - drag&drop - the percentage of the distance between the source and target > linked to the a

Re: Future of out-of-tree spell checkers?

2017-03-25 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2017-03-24 2:45 PM, Bill McCloskey wrote: > If we do end up going with the dlopen plan, let's make sure that we > enforce some kind of code signing. We're finally almost rid of all the > untrusted binary code that we used to load (NPAPI, binary XPCOM, > ctypes). It would be a shame to open up a

Intent to unship: :-moz-bound-element pseudo-class.

2017-03-25 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
I intend to remove the :-moz-bound-element CSS pseudo-class in bug 1350147. It's an XBL-related pseudo-class that allows matching the XBL element bound in the current subtree. We could implement it in Stylo, I guess, but it is slightly annoying, and seems completely unused and untested both in mo

Re: Better download security through browsers

2017-03-25 Thread Daniel Veditz
Most people working on sub-resource integrity has wanted to extend SRI to downloads, it was even in the initial version of the spec but foundered in the weeds of edge cases iirc. I don't see an open issue for it though: looks like it got lost in the transition from our old repo to the new one. It's