Regarding comment and flag mirroring, we've discussed this before:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/Y8kInYxo8UU/e3Pi-_FpBgAJ
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/Y8kInYxo8UU/tsF7UfxvBgAJ
Given that Phabricator is still new, I don't see any reason to reopen that
Yes, sorry, a couple of people pointed that out to me privately. And I
did get that mixed up; I was assuming processors, despite the page
specifically pointing out "physical cores".
I still think there's something to be kept in mind here, though. Even
with 4 processors (2 hyperthreaded cores o
I don't believe these counts take into account the number of usage hours
of each client, so people with 4+ cores may actually account for a
larger amount of relative Firefox usage than their absolute numbers
would suggest.
I am sure some people on the data / analyst / product side of Firefox
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Do we have numbers of how our installed base is split between earlier
> than Nehalem/Silvermont/Bulldozer vs. Nehalem/Silvermont/Bulldozer or
> later?
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1449496
I'd appreciate it if a CPUID e
That page says "physical cores", so its not taking into account hyper
threading, right? So even a high end macbook pro falls in that category?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Mike Conley wrote:
> Thanks for drawing attention to this, sfink.
>
> This is likely to become more important as we con
On 03/28/2018 12:09 AM, twisniew...@mozilla.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 4:38:56 PM UTC-4, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
>> That looks like an easy fix though, I'll ensure it gets fixed before
>> landing. Filed bug 1449010.
>
> If it helps, I had a patchset for this in bug 292563,
Are these actual "physical cores", or is this "hardware threads"?
There's very big difference between 2 and 2+HT these days.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Mike Conley wrote:
> Thanks for drawing attention to this, sfink.
>
> This is likely to become more important as we continue to scale up ou
On 3/27/2018 5:02 PM, Mike Conley wrote:
Thanks for drawing attention to this, sfink.
This is likely to become more important as we continue to scale up our
parallelization with content processes and threads.
How do these counts classify SMT systems (aka Hyperthreading)? Would 4
core * 2-way
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Makoto Kato wrote:
> Since SCTLR isn't allowed on userland, there is no way to detect unalignment
> access support without trap. Generally, unalignement access causes SIGBUS,
> so we might get a data from crash reporter. Android armv7-a ABI doesn't
> define that
Since SCTLR isn't allowed on userland, there is no way to detect
unalignment access support without trap. Generally, unalignement access
causes SIGBUS, so we might get a data from crash reporter. Android armv7-a
ABI doesn't define that hardware configuration has to set alignment bit of
SCTLR, so
Just noting that there's bug 1399962 right now -- and if you're single core
(like a large portion of very affordable PCs in the past two years or so),
the problem can be so bad (bug 1431835) that common sites like amazon can
turn Firefox into a not viable option.
--
David Durst [:ddurst]
On Tue,
Hi,
In bug 1398482 I'm unprefixing the grid-gap, grid-row-gap, and
grid-column-gap properties. The old names becomes aliases for
the respective unprefixed property.
I'm also adding support for the 'normal' keyword to these properties
and making it the initial value, per spec [1].
I'm also addin
Hi all,
just some random notes about Phabricator.
I've been reviewing now a bunch of patches in Phabricator and the initial
feeling from
reviewer's point of view is that it is ok. Not great, but ok.
MozReview's interdiff, when it works, is easier to use or at least to discover
than Phabricator
privacy.firstparty.isolate.restrict_opener_access is a pref for First
Party Isolation that relaxes the protections of FPI by allowing access
to window.opener across first party domains.
It was created because in Tor Browser's initial FPI patch, they
allowed this by mistake, and we wanted to keep b
Hellol Dev-platform,
These are now added to the catalog.
Core i9 Workstation:
https://mozilla.service-now.com/sp?id=sc_cat_item&sys_id=
56a3f19d13895f407b5450782244b00e
Dell Workstation
https://mozilla.service-now.com/sp?id=sc_cat_item&sys_id=4bfc7195138d5f407b5450782244b00b
Thanks
--
mo
15 matches
Mail list logo
