Congratulations Callek! I know this was a tremendous amount of work on
your side to implement and coordinate. Thank you for all your efforts to
drive this forward, it has unblocked a lot of future l10n work.
Kim
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at
On Thursday, 31 May 2018 02:44:51 UTC+12, Tom Ritter wrote:
> Oh. Are we doing this rustc inlining development on a particular old
> version of clang? I'm not even close to getting CFI ready but I'm
> basically working off llvm trunk as I'm finding and filing llvm bugs
> and working with llvm
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Justin Wood wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> tl;dr You should now see "L10n" jobs on treeherder with many pushes, these
> are tier 1 and if they break they would also be breaking Nightly so your
> patch would need to be backed out.
>
> As many of you know,
Congratulations Justin!
Excited to see this coming all together. With this change, we can now both
improve our software quality and culture of paying attention to red L10n in
treeherder :)
Thank you!
zb.
___
dev-platform mailing list
Hello Everyone,
tl;dr You should now see "L10n" jobs on treeherder with many pushes, these
are tier 1 and if they break they would also be breaking Nightly so your
patch would need to be backed out.
As many of you know, especially the old guard [1] here, Localized Repacks
have frequently been
The process finished this morning. The vast majority of bugs were successfully
reverted. As intended, some were skipped due to having been updated since the
first script ran. There were also a handful of unexpected errors that we will
be cleaning up manually. See
Hi!
I'm very proud to introduce the latest addition to our family of "explain
ourselves" efforts - shiny, new developer docs about locale management,
internationalization and localization practices at Mozilla.
https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/intl/index.html
We put a lot of effort to
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I'm sure the day we'll have to choose between not
> doing cross-language inlining or upgrading clang for e.g. security
> features is relatively close.
Oh. Are we doing this rustc inlining development on a particular old
version of clang?
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 02:40:01PM +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Dave Townsend wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:03 PM Jeff Gilbert wrote:
> >> I get that, but it reminds me of the reasons people give for "our
> >> website works best in $browser".
> >
> > I
We've also been running Windows code coverage builds with clang on CI for a
while (since December), with almost all tests.
- Marco.
On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 2:35:57 AM UTC+2, Anthony Jones wrote:
> You may already know that the Low-Level Tools team support important tools
> and code
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Dave Townsend wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:03 PM Jeff Gilbert wrote:
>> I get that, but it reminds me of the reasons people give for "our
>> website works best in $browser".
>
> I was concerned by this too but found myself swayed by the arguments in
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
