Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become similar to autoland)

2018-06-26 Thread Kris Maglione
Just to add one other point to this discussion: I *hate* backouts. I don't just mean of my patches. I mean in general. Whenever I come across a backout in a blame walk or a bisect, it makes my life much more difficult. And I know I'm not alone in this. I thought the policy for autoland was

Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become similar to autoland)

2018-06-26 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:36:22AM -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 6/26/18 6:53 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > > I agree that the default behavior of `-p all -u all -t all` is running too > > much and confusing people. I filed bug 1471404 to change the behavior. > > > > Will that be sufficient to

Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become similar to autoland)

2018-06-26 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 6/26/18 6:53 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: I agree that the default behavior of `-p all -u all -t all` is running too much and confusing people. I filed bug 1471404 to change the behavior. Will that be sufficient to fix the issue? The proposal is to have that syntax run all tier1 and tier2

Re: XPIDL trajectory

2018-06-26 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 01:24:27PM +1000, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > Thanks for the tip. I've updated the last part of the script accordingly: > > # Count number of bytes in the xptdata.o file. > cd o64 > echo -n "xptdata.o bytes: " > wc --bytes xpcom/reflect/xptinfo/xptdata.o > cd .. > > The

Re: XPIDL trajectory

2018-06-26 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
Thanks for the tip. I've updated the last part of the script accordingly: # Count number of bytes in the xptdata.o file. cd o64 echo -n "xptdata.o bytes: " wc --bytes xpcom/reflect/xptinfo/xptdata.o cd .. The current measurements are now: Tue, Jun 26, 2018: m-i 423583:4a20ed6e2fee .idl files:

Rust crate approval

2018-06-26 Thread Adam Gashlin
I'm in the process of writing my first Rust for Firefox, a standalone Windows service to be used for background updates. I've found a few good documents on how to handle the build technically, but I'm unclear on what process we use to review external crates. If there are general guidelines for

Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become similar to autoland)

2018-06-26 Thread Andreas Tolfsen
Also sprach Gregory Szorc: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Dave Townsend > wrote: > >> This doesn't seem to answer the question. I frequently do patches >> where I can't reliably guess the extent of test breakage and want >> to run a full set to be on the safe side. What try configuration >>

Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become similar to autoland)

2018-06-26 Thread Dave Townsend
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:54 PM Gregory Szorc wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Dave Townsend > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:06 PM Sebastian Hengst wrote: >> >> > Original-Nachricht >> > Betreff: Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become >>

Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become similar to autoland)

2018-06-26 Thread Gregory Szorc
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Dave Townsend wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:06 PM Sebastian Hengst wrote: > > > Original-Nachricht > > Betreff: Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become > > similar to autoland) > > Von: Boris Zbarsky > > Datum:

Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become similar to autoland)

2018-06-26 Thread Dave Townsend
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:06 PM Sebastian Hengst wrote: > Original-Nachricht > Betreff: Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become > similar to autoland) > Von: Boris Zbarsky > Datum: 2018-06-24 21:28 > > On 6/19/18 9:04 AM, Sebastian Hengst wrote: > >>

Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become similar to autoland)

2018-06-26 Thread Sebastian Hengst
Original-Nachricht Betreff: Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become similar to autoland) Von: Boris Zbarsky Datum: 2018-06-24 21:28 On 6/19/18 9:04 AM, Sebastian Hengst wrote: TL;DR: We would like to change the mozilla-inbound backout policy to be like

Re: DNS Rebinding protection

2018-06-26 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Brannon Dorsey wrote: Users can protect themselves from this type of attack by using a DNS resolver that filters out private IP addresses from public DNS responses. OpenDNS and dd-wrt can both provide this functionality if configured properly, but my question is, *why not

DNS Rebinding protection

2018-06-26 Thread Brannon Dorsey
Hi all, I'm an independent security researcher who has spent the last few months studying DNS rebinding attacks. My findings so far [1] are pretty grim, it appears that even 10-years

Re: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become similar to autoland)

2018-06-26 Thread Sebastian Hengst
The new policy will be used from now on. - Sebastian Original-Nachricht Betreff: mozilla-inbound backout policy subject to change (become similar to autoland) Von: Sebastian Hengst Datum: 2018-06-19 15:04 Hi, If you don't push code to mozilla-inbound, you can stop reading

Re: Slightly delayed Intent to Ship: getComputedStyle changes on some edge cases.

2018-06-26 Thread Mike Taylor
Hi Emilio, > On Jun 25, 2018, at 11:54 AM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > > Hi, > > Just something I figure was worth sending an email for, due to the potential > (ideally positive) web-compat impact. > > In bug 1467722[1], I brought us closer to the spec and to WebKit / Blink in > terms of

Re: XPIDL trajectory

2018-06-26 Thread Nika Layzell
Measuring the size of the xpt files is no longer as relevant. Since mccr8 and I rewrote xptinfo, they're only used during the build step, and are not bundled. They're combined into a single .cpp file (xptdata.cpp) which generates shared static pages (mostly) without relocations :-). Perhaps