Re: Visibility of disabled tests

2020-01-11 Thread Geoffrey Brown
Thanks Johann. I agree it is important that we try to fix tests that have been disabled. I think the sheriffs usually needinfo the triage owner before/when disabling a test; I'm disappointed to hear that isn't happening consistently. However, I'd prefer not to change the review process for the dis

Re: Intent to Prototype: beforeinput event (disabled by default even in Nightly channel)

2020-01-11 Thread Masayuki Nakano
On 2020/01/09 3:35, James Graham wrote: On 08/01/2020 09:54, Masayuki Nakano wrote: Summary: "beforeinput" event is useful for web apps which manage input data into ``, `` and/or `contenteditable`. This event is fired before our editor modifies value or DOM tree and some types are cancelable.

Intent to unship: JavaScript toSource and uneval

2020-01-11 Thread Tom Schuster
In bug 1565170 I plan to disable the toSource methods that exists for most objects in Firefox as well as the uneval method on the global object. This change will affect all websites and WebExtension. Both methods will still be available to Firefox internal (chrome) code, but I plan on removing thos

Re: Visibility of disabled tests

2020-01-11 Thread Andrew Sutherland
On 1/8/20 12:50 PM, Geoffrey Brown wrote: Instead of changing the reviewers, how about:  - we remind the sheriffs to needinfo  - #intermittent-reviewers check that needinfo is in place when reviewing disabling patches. To try and help address the visibility issue, we could also make searchfox

Re: Visibility of disabled tests

2020-01-11 Thread James Graham
On 09/01/2020 10:46, David Burns wrote: I think a lot of the problem is not necessarily a technical issue, meaning I am not sure that tooling will solve the problem, but it is more of a social problem. To exapnd a little on this; we've had various attempts at making disabled tests more visibl

Searchfox at All-Hands: Who's interested?

2020-01-11 Thread Andrew Sutherland
Are people interested in a session(s) at the All-Hands on Searchfox?  If you're interested in any of the following things, please email me here or at as...@mozilla.com or let me know via other channels, and let me know which of the following you'd be interested in.  My goal is to get a rough co

Re: Intent to Prototype: beforeinput event (disabled by default even in Nightly channel)

2020-01-11 Thread James Graham
On 08/01/2020 09:54, Masayuki Nakano wrote: Summary: "beforeinput" event is useful for web apps which manage input data into ``, `` and/or `contenteditable`. This event is fired before our editor modifies value or DOM tree and some types are cancelable. Therefore, if some user inputs are not

Re: Visibility of disabled tests

2020-01-11 Thread James Graham
On 07/01/2020 13:29, Johann Hofmann wrote: /For disabling tests, review from the test author, triage owner or a component peer is required. If they do not respond within 2? business days or if the frequency is higher than x, the test may be disabled without their consent, but the triage own

Proposed W3C Charter: Audio Working Group

2020-01-11 Thread L. David Baron
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: Audio Working Group https://www.w3.org/2011/audio/charter/audio-2019-ac.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Dec/0012.html The differences from the previous charter are: https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2F

Re: Visibility of disabled tests

2020-01-11 Thread David Burns
I think a lot of the problem is not necessarily a technical issue, meaning I am not sure that tooling will solve the problem, but it is more of a social problem. I think the problem is making sure that items are triaged and placed into peoples workflow sooner would solve this problem but I also ap