Re: Mozilla Location Services - Heads up

2014-02-04 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On 04.02.2014, at 19:08 , Mike Hoye wrote: > We really need an ARG and some badges for this, to give people some sort of > incentive to wander all over the place. Gamification is on the todo list. We have a small game development studio, which is going to start working on some prototype soon.

Re: Mozilla Location Services - Heads up

2014-02-03 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On 03.02.2014, at 15:55 , Wesley Hardman wrote: > I get a 404 response when using either address. Is this the expected > response? (My area is not mapped so I don't expect it to correctly find my > location.) Yes. You can read more about the API at: http://mozilla-ichnaea.readthedocs.org/en/l

Re: Mozilla Location Services - Heads up

2014-02-03 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On 03.02.2014, at 07:09 , Philip Chee wrote: > On 03/02/2014 09:03, Doug Turner wrote: >> One of the interesting things is that we can use this data to provide >> location based services to Firefox. I switched my install of Firefox >> to use Mozilla Location Service (MLS). You can try this by si

Re: Mozilla Location Services - Heads up

2014-02-03 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On 03.02.2014, at 02:03 , Doug Turner wrote: > One of the interesting things is that we can use this data to provide > location based services to Firefox. I switched my install of Firefox to use > Mozilla Location Service (MLS). You can try this by simply change the > preference "geo.wifi.uri

New dev-geolocation mailing list, for "open location" project and friends

2013-06-12 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. sorry, for the cross-post, please follow up on dev-geolocation Some of you might have noticed some upcoming patches for Firefox for Android relating to a Mozilla-run geo-location service. If you are interested in the backstory of this service or wonder what it is about, come join us in o

Re: Moving Away from Makefile's

2012-08-23 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On 23.08.2012, at 17:07 , Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > I think Gregory's suggestion of using the python's ast module to limit the > sorts of syntax constructs that we accept in the build manifest files is a > great one. That would let us make python powerful enough for our needs, but > not more powe