Re: Farcebook.messenger

Hi Till, I think you may be confused by the way a lot of tech news sites have announced it. "Much like the OpenSearch standard, Mozilla’s new Social APIlets social services integrate into Firefox in a compelling way and makes it easier to use the Web

Re: Push Notifications feedback

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:06 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > Are you people still working on this at mozilla.org? I noticed that the Wiki > now redirects to https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/PushAPI which seems specific > to FirefoxOS. > > I am interested in implementing the feature for other web browsers

Re: Intent to implement: NavigationController

On Wednesday, August 7, 2013 7:02:51 PM UTC-7, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Nikhil Marathe wrote: > > > > > On Monday, August 5, 2013 10:01:06 AM UTC-7, Mounir Lamouri wrote: > > > > On 26/07/13 18:29, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > &

Re: Intent to implement: NavigationController

There is no bug number yet, because I have about 15 lines of additional code :) On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2013-08-08 12:20 PM, Nikhil Marathe wrote: > >> On Wednesday, August 7, 2013 7:02:51 PM UTC-7, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: >> >>> On

Intent to replace Promise.jsm and promise.js with DOM Promises

(Cross posted to firefox-dev, please reply on dev.platform) DOM Promise has been in the tree for a while, and is enabled for ChromeWorkers and certified apps. With a couple of patches, it will achieve conformance with the AP2 spec [1], which is what TC39 has accepted as the bare minimum for Promis

Intent to ship DOM Promises

As off January 28, our DOM Promises implementation implements the es6 promises spec. [1] It is feature complete, and passes the Promises/A+ tests. [2] I intend to enable it by default this week so that it ships in Firefox 30. Caveats: We don't support subclassing, which is a ES6 feature, but neith

Re: Disabling a few mochitests this week, and upcoming changes next week to browser-chrome

On 08/26/2014 12:52 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote: > Thanks for the update! Very helpful. > > For bug 1058695, it looks like bz/khuey are trying to rope in Nikhil > to help - Nikhil, I don't know what the rest of your current workload > looks like, but if you could help chase that bug down that would be >

Cross origin communication and the navigator.connect API

(cross posted dev.b2g since this seems very relevant to it, but please keep the discussion on dev.platform) Hi All, As part of the ServiceWorker initiative [1], Google is proposing a `navigator.connect` API [2] to allow cross-origin ServiceWorker communication. This post is mostly a notice to inf

Re: Cross origin communication and the navigator.connect API

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2014-12-10 12:21 AM, Nikhil Marathe wrote: > >> (cross posted dev.b2g since this seems very relevant to it, but please >> keep >> the discussion on dev.platform) >> >> Hi All, >> >> As par