Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Petr Cerny wrote:
Saying "Linux is good, we can actually do things there, that are
more complicated elsewhere, but you are hindering our development"
sound a bit unfair.
There is no contradiction between Rust working the bes
ore fundamental
changes in functionality the releases shortly after ESR release - e.g.
say ESR+1 to ESR+3, while introducing implementation details (rewriting
C/C++ into Rust) shortly before or with ESR release (to make ESR
maintenance easier). And announce those early (I don't think this can be
overstated).
Thanks
Kind regards
Petr
--
Petr Cerny
Mozilla/OpenSSH maintainer for SUSE Linux
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
7 or newer then their developers can stoll go this route to
package it. Theoretically it only needs to be done once, right?
Question is, whether we'll be fine with some 7 iterations like you
suggest or we'd need the ~300 steps Henri mentioned.
Petr
--
Petr Cerny
Mozilla/Op
Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Sure, once you are on similar level of stability to GCC, it is not such
> a big problem. Note that GCC 5.3.0 (to my best knowledge) can be
> compiled by GCC-3.4 (10 years difference). Once rustc is capable of
> being compiled by a one or two years older version of itsel
ble rustc codebase - stable in the sense that a
>> recompile would only be necessary on the order of magnitude of ESR
>> releases (note: I'm writing this without any knowledge about
>> current rustc compile requirements). This would allow distributions
>> to perform the long
e order of magnitude of ESR releases (note:
I'm writing this without any knowledge about current rustc compile
requirements). This would allow distributions to perform the long
iteration chain once and then update rustc only from time to time.
Thanks
Kind regards
Petr
--
Petr Cerny
Mozilla/OpenSSH maintainer for SUSE Linux
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
ation, after reading up a bit on the
topic and some conversations with people who have deeper insight, many
of my reservations were gone).
Thanks
Kind regards
Petr
--
Petr Cerny
Mozilla/OpenSSH maintainer for SUSE Linux
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
7 matches
Mail list logo