On Sunday, March 2, 2014 10:58:28 AM UTC-8, Asa Dotzler wrote:
> How much simpler could our style code be if we followed this path? What
>
> do the standards and other browser vendors say about this? Horrible
>
> idea? Great idea? Mixed?
>
>
>
> "This is in preparation for simplifying the Blink style
>
> resolution code by removing the concept of user styles."
>
>
>
> https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?revision=234007&view=revision
>
>
>
> - A
Since when was removing widely-used functionality without good reason
considered progress? Can you quantify the potential performance increase,
increase in user satisfaction, or any other benefit that might come as a result
of this? Because fixing annoyances with something as simple as
#TabsToolbar:not(:-moz-lwtheme)::after{box-shadow: none;} should not require an
entire extension to be installed. Also, taking pages out of Chrome's book
w/r/t removing options/customizability isn't the best idea.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
