Re: Split Gecko in standalone fuzzing-friendly programs.

2016-03-09 Thread twsmith
On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 12:47:08 PM UTC-8, decod...@googlemail.com wrote: > > > > > the sample tests (xpcshell-tests) are extremely complicated to adapt > > > > That seems like it would be a problem in any new thing too, right? > > Actually no. I adapted our gtests in less than an hour.

Re: Split Gecko in standalone fuzzing-friendly programs.

2016-03-09 Thread twsmith
This seems to be the general response whenever this topic is brought up, with good reason. I don't think modularizing Gecko just for the sake of it makes much sense. What I think the take away from this should be is: when developing a new component or maintaining an old one keep in mind that

Re: Split Gecko in standalone fuzzing-friendly programs.

2016-03-09 Thread twsmith
On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 9:38:55 AM UTC-8, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote: > This discussion is a follow-up discussion to some emails sent privately by > accident. > > If you have not followed, I will quote David Bryant: > > Improving release quality is one of the three fundamental goals