Re: Intent to implement and ship: overflow-block and overflow-inline CSS properties

Preference behind which this will be implemented: layout.css.overflow-logical.enabled Enabled by default. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Intent to implement and ship: overflow-block and overflow-inline CSS properties

> It's probably a good idea to have a pref controlling whether these get parsed, so we can disable if needed if there's an issue, given that no one has shipped these yet in a final release. Ok, I'll add a flag for this. > Are these just logical versions of the existing overflow-x and overflow-y p

Re: Intent to implement and ship: overflow-block and overflow-inline CSS properties

> Chrome has shipped these properties in latest Canary, commit: > https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/985a82ce4c869aca8e33dc213293a37b2764d69c To clarify, Chrome has just implemented a few days ago, it's not "shipped" yet. The status can be found here: https://chromium.googlesource.

Intent to implement and ship: overflow-block and overflow-inline CSS properties

Summary: implement overflow-block and overflow-inline CSS properties Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1470695 Link to standard: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow-3/#logical Platform coverage: all. Estimated or target release: 69 Preference behind which this will be impleme

Intent to implement and ship: break-spaces value of the white-space property

Summary: implement and ship value "break-spaces" of "white-space" CSS property Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1351432 Link to standard: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-3/#valdef-white-space-break-spaces Platform coverage: all. Estimated or target release: 69 Preference b

Re: How to reliably make an ArrayBufferView wrapped?

Thank you for the detailed explanation! It works. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: How to reliably make an ArrayBufferView wrapped?

> Are you trying to write a JS shell test or a browser test? I think it should be a browser test, because I need to call IndexedDB. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

How to reliably make an ArrayBufferView wrapped?

When solving this bug https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D24009. I need to write a test. The bug is basically caused by overlooking the possible wrapper around an ArrayBufferView that is checked by JS_IsArrayBufferViewObject(). See https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/js/src/vm/A

Re: android-em-4-3-armv7-api16 possibly falsy timeout

It's clean now that the tests were successfully passed, the problem is on the testing platform. I've filed a new bug for the problem and marked these intermittent timeout failure as duplicates. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1536696

android-em-4-3-armv7-api16 possibly falsy timeout

Hi, There are some strange intermittent timeout reports on android-em-4-3-armv7-api16 platform, I suspect there is something wrong on this test platform. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1533737 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1535286 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_b

Re: Where to put timeout test?

On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 10:12:48 PM UTC-8, Cameron McCormack wrote: > You can use a crashtest for this under layout/svg/crashtests/. crashtests > are like reftests that don't actually check against a reference, but will > just fail if the test crashes, or causes some assertions, or times o

Where to put timeout test?

Hi, When fixing [this](https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20947) bug, I need to add a test. If the patch is not applied, the test will spend almost infinite time to render a SVG; while if the patch is applied, it can be rendered instantly. However, both the reviewer and me don't know ho