Thanks for everyone's feedback.
We're starting on the implementation in these bugs
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1542378 (enter bug form),
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1545258 (create new field),
and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1543876 (migrate exist
When I was emailing this yesterday, I neglected to shout out folks for
their help: Calixte suggested the improvements, and the plan benefited from
Marco's reflecting on what we were trying to achieve. I recommend reading
the thread https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1534280 to follow
the
On 4/29/19 6:15 PM, Emma Humphries wrote:
We’re replacing the regression and regressionwindow-wanted keywords, and
the has-regression-range field with is_regression
Emma,
Thank you, the new setup seems a lot clearer about the state of the bug
in terms of regression tracking!
-Boris
We are making more changes to how we report and track regressions in
Bugzilla.
There are multiple fields and keywords we use to track regressions in
Bugzilla. It’s confusing and the fields are used inconsistently across
teams.
We are consolidating these fields to reduce confusion and provide a
4 matches
Mail list logo
