(Follow-ups to dev.tree-management please)
Hi all :-)
The vast majority of mozilla-central landings are now via curated merges
from integration/team repositories. This dramatically increases the
chance that the tip of mozilla-central is in a known-good state, meaning
that:
* Integration/pro
Ed Morley wrote:
(Follow-ups to dev.tree-management please)
Hi all :-)
The vast majority of mozilla-central landings are now via curated merges
from integration/team repositories. This dramatically increases the
chance that the tip of mozilla-central is in a known-good state, meaning
that:
*
>(Follow-ups to dev.tree-management please)
>A proportion of the current mozilla-central non-critical commits are made
>by people inadvertently pushing to the wrong repository. To prevent these,
>once the tree rules are adjusted on the wiki the sheriffs envisage the next
>step will be switching moz
On 07/04/2014 10:37, Ed Morley wrote:
Non-critical mozilla-central landings are already discouraged and as
such are rare. However, the sheriffs [2] would like to formalise this,
by adjusting the mozilla-central tree rules [3] to state that direct
pushes must be for one of the following reasons:
4 matches
Mail list logo
