Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
They key magic was that NS_DECLARE_STATIC_IID_ACCESSOR is specialized
on the type itself and not on a dummy class.
I had tried specialising on the type itself, but the way I originally
did it was only a link error rather than a compile error. I had also
tried templat
On 3/6/2014 8:32 PM, Neil wrote:
Because of the way GetIID/NS_GET_IID works, it's not very easy to get
the compiler to tell you when you're doing it wrong. So far I've come
up with a way to get the linker to do it. I'm trying to get the
compiler to do it, but the results aren't perfect. However
L. David Baron wrote:
On Friday 2014-03-07 01:32 +, Neil wrote:
I noticed a couple of places that queried for a concrete class which didn't
have its own IID, which means that you end up querying for the base interface
instead.
Does the solution we use for do_QueryFrame work here
On Friday 2014-03-07 01:32 +, Neil wrote:
> Because of the way GetIID/NS_GET_IID works, it's not very easy to
> get the compiler to tell you when you're doing it wrong. So far I've
> come up with a way to get the linker to do it. I'm trying to get the
> compiler to do it, but the results aren't
Because of the way GetIID/NS_GET_IID works, it's not very easy to get
the compiler to tell you when you're doing it wrong. So far I've come up
with a way to get the linker to do it. I'm trying to get the compiler to
do it, but the results aren't perfect. However along the way I have
noticed som
5 matches
Mail list logo
