Do we have naming conventions for new xpcom interfaces?
I believe that I have seen all three forms on the tree. I need to pick
one for my new bug. Which one should I pick?
Cheers,
David
(Cross-posting to ask.mozilla.org)
--
David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD
Performance Team, Mozilla
On 2/17/14 9:29 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
For C++ interfaces, namespaced IFoo or Foo.
namespaced IFoo always makes me search MSDN for information about this
Windows interface we must be using... Why is that form preferable?
-Boris
___
dev-platform
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 2/17/14 9:29 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
For C++ interfaces, namespaced IFoo or Foo.
namespaced IFoo always makes me search MSDN for information about this
Windows interface we must be using... Why is that form preferable?
On 17/02/2014 15:15, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
Do we have naming conventions for new xpcom interfaces?
I believe that I have seen all three forms on the tree. I need to pick
one for my new bug. Which one should I pick?
afaik there has been a period where we tried to move off of nsI
On 2/17/2014, 9:15 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
Do we have naming conventions for new xpcom interfaces?
I believe that I have seen all three forms on the tree. I need to pick
one for my new bug. Which one should I pick?
Avoid ISomething since that means something on Windows.
I think
On 2/17/2014, 12:11 PM, Marco Bonardo wrote:
On 17/02/2014 15:15, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
Do we have naming conventions for new xpcom interfaces?
I believe that I have seen all three forms on the tree. I need to pick
one for my new bug. Which one should I pick?
afaik there has been a
On 2/17/14 12:41 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2/17/2014, 9:15 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
Do we have naming conventions for new xpcom interfaces?
I believe that I have seen all three forms on the tree. I need to pick
one for my new bug. Which one should I pick?
Avoid ISomething since
7 matches
Mail list logo
