Hi all,
I'd like to disable service workers in 52 ESR. This would also require
disabling push notifications.
A year ago we decided to disable service workers in 45 ESR because it was
very new and unstable:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/mozilla.dev.platform/yuNHtDhl3lY/VWXOa8N9AgAJ
Whil
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Ben Kelly wrote:
> While things have stabilized since then we are in process of making a major
> architectural change in order to support multiple content processes
> (multi-e10s). This will make it very difficult to uplift fixes. Once the
> new architecture has
That'll mean that Windows XP/Vista users won't have them.
Might be ok, but means the bar for a decision like this should be somewhat
higher than usual, I think.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Ben Kelly wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to disable service workers in 52 ESR. This would also requir
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Ben Kelly wrote:
> > While things have stabilized since then we are in process of making a
> major
> > architectural change in order to support multiple content processes
> > (multi-e10s). This will make
> I would expect not, though, since we are
>> still rolling it out to the full population.
I do believe the plan is to enable e10s on 52 ESR, but with the Firefox
50 restrictions (e10s enabled by default, disabled if a11y APIs used,
disabled if non-WebExtension, non-mpc=true add-ons enabled).
Tha
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Till Schneidereit <
t...@tillschneidereit.net> wrote:
> That'll mean that Windows XP/Vista users won't have them.
>
> Might be ok, but means the bar for a decision like this should be somewhat
> higher than usual, I think.
>
Understood, but that does not change t
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Ben Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Till Schneidereit <
> t...@tillschneidereit.net> wrote:
>
>> That'll mean that Windows XP/Vista users won't have them.
>>
>> Might be ok, but means the bar for a decision like this should be
>> somewhat higher t
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> API. On the other hand, sites like caniuse.com clearly advertise that
> ServiceWorkers are available in Firefox (and Chrome), and then going
> back and not exposing that in the ESR population seems to me that in a
> sense, we break a kind
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Ben Kelly wrote:
> Last I checked we do this all the time for new and potentially unstable
> things. For example, AFAIK we do not enable e10s on ESR. I have not heard
> if that will change for 52 ESR. I would expect not, though, since we are
> still rolling it o
This sounds like a good plan, Ben. IIUC, we're committing to support
all our ESRs for a year, so anything we can do to make uplifts easier
is sensible.
Till brings up a good point about folks on older platforms, but it's
likely they'll already have a degraded experience on many sites. I
expect fut
Any time something is disabled or removed from ESR, please be sure the
developer docs team knows about it, because that’s something that has to be
reflected in our documentation. I’m not aware of many (if any) documentation
that says something exists in version X but not in ESR version X; that’s
We disabled some features (iirc Hello and Pocket) in ESR45. The preference
is to keep ESR inline with what's in the mainline release but we're also
supporting ESR on a best effort basis. I think the rationale in this thread
for disabling service workers and push in ESR52 makes sense if we're not
go
Do we already have a bug for this? Firefox 52 will be shipped just in 4 weeks.
On 2017-01-18 10:49 AM, Ben Kelly wrote:
I'd like to disable service workers in 52 ESR. This would also require
disabling push notifications.
A year ago we decided to disable service workers in 45 ESR because it was
I just filed:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1338144
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Kohei Yoshino
wrote:
> Do we already have a bug for this? Firefox 52 will be shipped just in 4
> weeks.
>
>
> On 2017-01-18 10:49 AM, Ben Kelly wrote:
>
>> I'd like to disable service workers in 5
14 matches
Mail list logo