Re: Intent to implement and ship: WebXR Device API in Firefox Nightly

2019-12-03 Thread kgilbert
On Tuesday, August 28, 2018 at 5:16:14 PM UTC-7, kgil...@mozilla.com wrote: > Hi David, > > These are all great points, thanks for reviewing this. > > The intent is to not allow WebXR in any iframe (not just sandboxed ones), > until the discussions have settled. I appreciate the feedback on

Re: Intent to implement and ship: WebXR Device API in Firefox Nightly

2018-08-28 Thread kgilbert
Hi David, These are all great points, thanks for reviewing this. The intent is to not allow WebXR in any iframe (not just sandboxed ones), until the discussions have settled. I appreciate the feedback on the feature policy approach and how the origin would be presented to the user. Much of

Re: Intent to implement and ship: WebXR Device API in Firefox Nightly

2018-08-07 Thread L. David Baron
On Monday 2018-07-30 17:03 -0700, Kip Gilbert wrote: > Is this feature enabled by default in sandboxed iframes? > WebXR will not be enabled by default in sandboxed iframes. This will likely > be enabled later, by use of Feature Policy: > https://github.com/immersive-web/webxr/issues/86 >

Re: Intent to implement and ship: WebXR Device API in Firefox Nightly

2018-08-07 Thread Eric Shepherd (Sheppy)
Thank you; that will help the docs team very much as well. On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 7/30/18 8:03 PM, Kip Gilbert wrote: > >> Link to standard: >> > > Kip, > > Could you please ensure that all the relevant .webidl files have links to > the relevant bits of the

Re: Intent to implement and ship: WebXR Device API in Firefox Nightly

2018-08-07 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 7/30/18 8:03 PM, Kip Gilbert wrote: Link to standard: Kip, Could you please ensure that all the relevant .webidl files have links to the relevant bits of the standard at the top of the file (and on the individual interface definitions if there are multiple interfaces in the file)? See

Re: Intent to implement and ship: WebXR Device API in Firefox Nightly

2018-07-30 Thread kgilbert
On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 5:22:05 PM UTC-7, kgil...@mozilla.com wrote: > Correction: "As of 2019-10-01" should be "As of 2018-10-01"... > Also.. Should be "The implementation is expected to be completed for Firefox 66, but would be enabled as early as Firefox 65 if implementation goes

Re: Intent to implement and ship: WebXR Device API in Firefox Nightly

2018-07-30 Thread kgilbert
Correction: "As of 2019-10-01" should be "As of 2018-10-01"... On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 5:03:38 PM UTC-7, Kip Gilbert wrote: > Summary: > > The successor to WebVR 1.1, the WebXR Device API 1.0, is nearing > finalization. The WebXR Device API follows modern Web API patterns, is > extensible

Intent to implement and ship: WebXR Device API in Firefox Nightly

2018-07-30 Thread Kip Gilbert
Summary: The successor to WebVR 1.1, the WebXR Device API 1.0, is nearing finalization. The WebXR Device API follows modern Web API patterns, is extensible additively for augmented reality, enables use within Web Workers, and solves many security problems for the VR and AR enabled web. The