Re: Intent to implement and ship FormData on workers

2015-01-30 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 1/30/15 1:30 AM, nsm.nik...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Well my work on getting FormData on workers was because Fetch uses it, and >> there doesn't seem to have been demand for it on workers before. > > > That's fair, but it seems like exposing

Re: Intent to implement and ship FormData on workers

2015-01-30 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 1/30/15 1:30 AM, nsm.nik...@gmail.com wrote: Well my work on getting FormData on workers was because Fetch uses it, and there doesn't seem to have been demand for it on workers before. That's fair, but it seems like exposing it separately, if it's going to be ready before the rest of Fetch

Re: Intent to implement and ship FormData on workers

2015-01-29 Thread nsm . nikhil
On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 6:41:53 PM UTC-8, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 1/29/15 5:10 PM, nsm.nik...@gmail.com wrote: > > Pref: I intend to hide this behind dom.fetch.enabled, which also controls > > the Fetch specification. > > May I ask why? This seems like a totally reasonable thing to ex

Re: Intent to implement and ship FormData on workers

2015-01-29 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 1/29/15 5:10 PM, nsm.nik...@gmail.com wrote: Pref: I intend to hide this behind dom.fetch.enabled, which also controls the Fetch specification. May I ask why? This seems like a totally reasonable thing to expose independently of Fetch, and might be good to have it in a release before Fet

Re: Intent to implement and ship FormData on workers

2015-01-29 Thread Kyle Huey
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > Personally, I don't think it needs to be hidden behind a pref. Given that > FormData has been exposed on window, and the usage is mostly identical, I > suggest it be shipped directly. > > - Xidorn > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, wrote: >

Re: Intent to implement and ship FormData on workers

2015-01-29 Thread Xidorn Quan
Personally, I don't think it needs to be hidden behind a pref. Given that FormData has been exposed on window, and the usage is mostly identical, I suggest it be shipped directly. - Xidorn On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, wrote: > Summary: The FormData interface allows sending forms directly vi

Intent to implement and ship FormData on workers

2015-01-29 Thread nsm . nikhil
Summary: The FormData interface allows sending forms directly via XHR. It has previously been exposed on window. This intent is to expose it on workers and allow the same usage, i.e: - Creating FormData objects and adding string values or blobs to them - Sending FormData objects via a call to xhr