On 03/02/2016 05:34 PM, Matt Brubeck wrote:
I think that Mozilla should comment in favor of the PEWG charter. Mozilla has
been participating in the WG and it is doing important work for interop and
performance of pointer input handling.
+1
___
dev
On Wednesday 2016-03-02 07:34 -0800, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> I think that Mozilla should comment in favor of the PEWG charter. Mozilla has
> been participating in the WG and it is doing important work for interop and
> performance of pointer input handling.
OK, I'll vote in support of the charter,
I think that Mozilla should comment in favor of the PEWG charter. Mozilla has
been participating in the WG and it is doing important work for interop and
performance of pointer input handling.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
The W3C is proposing a charter for:
Pointer Events Working Group
https://www.w3.org/2016/02/pointer-events-2015.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Feb/.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
Friday, March 4.
Please reply to th
On 10/11/2012 07:55 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C is proposing a charter for a new Pointer Events
Working Group. For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2012Sep/0017.html
http://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/charter/charter-proposed.html
Mozilla has the opport
W3C is proposing a charter for a new Pointer Events
Working Group. For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2012Sep/0017.html
http://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/charter/charter-proposed.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
Thu
6 matches
Mail list logo
