Re: Question about Bugzilla bug dependencies

2013-01-07 Thread Justin Dolske
On 1/7/13 1:02 PM, Chris Peterson wrote: I've seen some inconsistent usage, so I just wanted to get a group opinion. If a fix for bug X introduces regression bug Y, should Y "block" X (because X is not properly fixed until regression Y is fixed) or should Y "depend on" X (because regression Y do

Re: Question about Bugzilla bug dependencies

2013-01-07 Thread Gavin Sharp
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:13 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Monday 2013-01-07 13:02 -0800, Chris Peterson wrote: >> I've seen some inconsistent usage, so I just wanted to get a group opinion. >> >> If a fix for bug X introduces regression bug Y, should Y "block" X >> (because X is not properly fixe

Re: Question about Bugzilla bug dependencies

2013-01-07 Thread L. David Baron
On Monday 2013-01-07 13:02 -0800, Chris Peterson wrote: > I've seen some inconsistent usage, so I just wanted to get a group opinion. > > If a fix for bug X introduces regression bug Y, should Y "block" X > (because X is not properly fixed until regression Y is fixed) This one. At least, until w

Re: Question about Bugzilla bug dependencies

2013-01-07 Thread Kyle Huey
Y blocks X. On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Chris Peterson wrote: > I've seen some inconsistent usage, so I just wanted to get a group opinion. > > If a fix for bug X introduces regression bug Y, should Y "block" X > (because X is not properly fixed until regression Y is fixed) or should Y > "dep

Question about Bugzilla bug dependencies

2013-01-07 Thread Chris Peterson
I've seen some inconsistent usage, so I just wanted to get a group opinion. If a fix for bug X introduces regression bug Y, should Y "block" X (because X is not properly fixed until regression Y is fixed) or should Y "depend on" X (because regression Y does not exist without fix X)? thanks, c