Chris,
I was discussing with sphinx leaders and we can build models from
audiobooks as well.
This approach saves a lot of time and enhances the quality since the
narrative is well accurate and clear.
We are currently defining a way to create hindi and brazilian portuguese
models.
Thanks
Andre
November 8, 2014 8:50:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Intent to ship: Web Speech API - Speech Recognition with
> Pocketsphinx
> Hi Olli,
> > How much does Pocketsphinx increase binary size? or download size?
> In the past was suggested to avoid ship the models with packages, but yes to
&
uot; , dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2014 8:50:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Intent to ship: Web Speech API - Speech Recognition with
> Pocketsphinx
> Hi Olli,
> > How much does Pocketsphinx increase binary size? or download size?
> In the past was sugges
Sorry, I forgot the links:
2 - Speechrtc offline on Firefox OS (Peak): http://youtu.be/FXKXhrRDEb8
3 - Continuous speech recognition on android with poc…:
http://youtu.be/3lTtCFaQF2A
On Nov 9, 2014 11:12 AM, "Andre Natal" wrote:
> Hi Marco.
>
> SpeechRTC was my first tentative with the platfor
Hi Marco.
SpeechRTC was my first tentative with the platform. At early 2013 neither I
had enough knowledge about gecko internals as even b2g was at very early
stage (in the very beggining, Steven Lee needed to send me patches to gum
work properly), so the fastest path was capture and stream online
Thank you Chris, sure we can do it!
Here we have a straightforward page with all objects and methods for the
Speech API we are aiming to do:
https://github.com/andrenatal/webspeechapi/blob/gh-pages/index_clean.html
Maybe we can start from it.
Thanks!
Andre
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Chr
Hi Chris.
For new languages, after the decoder get integrated inside gecko, you only
need to build new models (acoustic and language), since the decoder is
language agnostic.
The procedure of model building is the same for every language: in pretty
big picture, you need to record thousands of hou
Hi Olli,
> How much does Pocketsphinx increase binary size? or download size?
In the past was suggested to avoid ship the models with packages, but yes
to create a preferences panel in the apps to allow the user to download the
models he wants to.
About the size of pocketsphinx libraries itself
Thanks Nick, I appreciate your help.
I created two versions of Fennec apk: one [1] with the english models
bundled (43.7 mb), and other [2] without it (34.6mb). This was the
mozconfig I used [3]
Actually, I had a conversation with Jonas Sicking some months ago and we
agreed that the ideal scenar
Awesome to see this mail, Andre!
And remember that we do have the pages set up on MDN ready to be filled in also.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Speech_API
Once this is shipped, do you think we can find some time to start collaborating
on these docs?
Chris Mills
Senior
Hi Andre,
It is a nice work and expect the voice recognition on B2G.
Beside this final result, I am also interesting in the reason of you migrate
from SpeechRTC -> emscripten -> Web Speech API.
Could you also share what is the factor triggered these transition? Then that
can be the lesson le
On 31/10/2014 11:45 AM, Chris Hofmann wrote:
The place we really need this is b2g, but phones are only shipping in
international markets right now so english only is not all that helpful.
While this doesn't change the point you are making in any way, FWIW,
Firefox OS phones are on sale in Aust
On 10/30/14 5:24 PM, smaug wrote:
On 10/31/2014 02:21 AM, smaug wrote:
Intent to ship is too strong for this.
We need to first have implementation landed and tested ;)
I wouldn't ship the implementation in desktop FF without plenty of
more testing.
But I guess the question is what people t
Intent to ship is too strong for this.
We need to first have implementation landed and tested ;)
I wouldn't ship the implementation in desktop FF without plenty of more testing.
-Olli
On 10/31/2014 01:18 AM, Andre Natal wrote:
I've been researching speech recognition in Firefox for two year
On 10/31/2014 02:21 AM, smaug wrote:
Intent to ship is too strong for this.
We need to first have implementation landed and tested ;)
I wouldn't ship the implementation in desktop FF without plenty of more testing.
But I guess the question is what people think about shipping the pocketspinx +
On 2014-10-30, 4:18 PM, Andre Natal wrote:
I've been researching speech recognition in Firefox for two years. First
SpeechRTC, then emscripten, and now Web Speech API with CMU pocketsphinx
[1] embedded in Gecko C++ layer, project that I had the luck to develop for
Google Summer of Code with the m
16 matches
Mail list logo
