Re: Some site performance analysis from Google

2015-03-30 Thread Karl Dubost
Le 31 mars 2015 à 07:43, James Graham ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk a écrit : There is also a view with some extra comments at [1] which are worth reading. [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/view# And to not forget the title, if people missed the

Re: Some site performance analysis from Google

2015-03-30 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: This is a quick read and an interesting analysis of how various sites fail to achieve acceptable performance on mobile: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/pub One

Re: Some site performance analysis from Google

2015-03-30 Thread James Graham
On 30/03/15 22:49, Robert O'Callahan wrote: This is a quick read and an interesting analysis of how various sites fail to achieve acceptable performance on mobile: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/pub There is also a view with some extra comments

Re: Some site performance analysis from Google

2015-03-30 Thread James Graham
On 30/03/15 23:55, Karl Dubost wrote: Le 31 mars 2015 à 07:43, James Graham ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk a écrit : There is also a view with some extra comments at [1] which are worth reading. [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/view# And to

Re: Some site performance analysis from Google

2015-03-30 Thread Karl Dubost
Le 31 mars 2015 à 08:14, James Graham ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk a écrit : If you just mean that the specifics of this analysis have all been done in Blink then yes, That's all. That was context. very general lessons in there about the perf-destroying things that authors do, which provides an