On 8/9/13 9:27 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
I think we should definitely report to the error console.
I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903419
-Boris
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.or
This definitely makes sense.
In the JS implementation, assuming main thread only, we should be able
to rig together a finalizer/warning using XPCOM.
Cheers,
David
On 8/9/13 3:27 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Well, the obvious other thing would be window.onerror. But that might
> be tough, since m
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Well, the obvious other thing would be window.onerror. But that might be
> tough, since making GC effects be page-observable is not great.
Yeah, I thought that would be out for precisely that reason.
> I think we should definitely report t
On 8/9/13 9:13 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Oh, that is a _very_ interesting idea. I wonder whether we can get that
specced, or at least allowed by the spec.
If it's just to the error console, we can do whatever we want. Do you
have someth
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Oh, that is a _very_ interesting idea. I wonder whether we can get that
> specced, or at least allowed by the spec.
If it's just to the error console, we can do whatever we want. Do you
have something else in mind?
--
http://annevankester
On 8/9/13 5:54 AM, Neil wrote:
(For instance I suspect it might be feasible for DOM promises
to report any pending exception when they get garbage collected.)
Oh, that is a _very_ interesting idea. I wonder whether we can get that
specced, or at least allowed by the spec.
-Boris
__
Paolo Amadini wrote:
This is a quick reminder to anyone writing or reviewing code that uses
"Promise.jsm".
How do the other promise implementations in the tree compare in this
respect? (For instance I suspect it might be feasible for DOM promises
to report any pending exception when they g
7 matches
Mail list logo
